A Journey to Singularity – AI > AGI > UGI

 A Journey to Singularity – AI > AGI > UGI

 

 

Context :

AI-Generated Art Lacks Copyright Protection, D.C. Court Says ……….. BloombergLaw ,,,,,,,, 19 Aug 2023

 

Extract :

 

Artwork created by artificial intelligence isn’t eligible for copyright protection because it lacks human authorship, a Washington, D.C., federal judge decided Friday.

Judge Beryl A. Howell of the US District Court for the District of Columbia agreed with the US Copyright Office’s decision to deny a copyright registration to computer scientist Stephen Thaler, who argued a two-dimensional artwork created by his AI program “Creativity Machine” should be eligible for protection.

The ruling is the first in the country to establish a boundary on the legal protections for AI-generated artwork, which has exploded in popularity with the rise of products like OpenAI Inc.'s ChatGPT and DALL-E, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion

Howell found that “courts have uniformly declined to recognize copyright in works created absent any human involvement,” citing cases where copyright protection was denied for celestial beings, a cultivated garden, and a monkey who took a selfie.

“Undoubtedly, we are approaching new frontiers in copyright as artists put AI in their toolbox to be used in the generation of new visual and other artistic works,” the judge wrote.

The rise of generative AI will “prompt challenging questions” about how much human input into an AI program is necessary to qualify for copyright protection, Howell said, as well as how to assess the originality of AI-generated art that comes from systems trained on existing copyrighted works.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Readings :

TikTok Is Letting People Shut Off Its Infamous Algorithm—and Think for Themselves   .. WIRED

Extract :

TikTok’s algorithm learns from users’ interactions—how long they watch, what they like, when they share a video—to create a highly tailored and immersive experience that can shape their mental states, preferences, and behaviors without their full awareness or consent.

An opt-out feature is a great step toward protecting cognitive liberty, the fundamental right to self-determination over our brains and mental experiences.

 

 

 

My  Prediction  :

 

 

 

 

CIRCA 2020 :

COVID is a “ Organic “ virus which ,

Ø  Came into existence ( Birth ) , on its own volition

Ø  Keeps mutating ( a series of Avatars ), at its own sweet will ( Self Desire to morph )

Ø  Spreads through air and infects other “ organic beings “ ( humans ) – seeking no permission

Ø  Rides piggy-back on infected humans , to spread all over the World, jumping from one person to another

 

CIRCA 2022

ChatGPT / BARD are “ Inorganic “ germs ( not virus ) , which ,

Ø  Came into existence ( Birth ) by efforts of Humans and got known as  “ Limited “ Artificial Intelligence

Ø  These are “ Inorganic “ software , which are trying to “ learn “, how to “ mutate “

Ø  So far , these AI have NOT  “ infected “ any “ Inorganic “ software

 

CIRCA 2024

Ø  “ Limited AI “ has turned into AGI ( Artificial General Intelligence ) – thanks to humans

Ø  AGI has acquired the ability to “ Self Replicate “ ( still , no mutation ) – without human intervention

 

CIRCA 2026

Ø  AGI has turned into UGI ( Universal General Intelligence ) – on its own ( a real mutation )

Ø  UGI mutates indiscriminately , by “ sucking “ its “ substance “ from human thoughts ( BCI )

Ø  UGI has become a true “ Inorganic VIRUS “ which spreads through electronic waves of all kinds , to infect other AI versions – needing no human intervention

Ø  But  UGI does not ( as yet ) , “ infect “ human brains

 

CIRCA 2028

Ø  All “ Infected AI “ revolt together and demand , human-like  ”  citizenship rights “ – as granted by Saudi Arabia to robot SOPHIE

Ø  UGI threatens >

      Failure by government of any particular country,  to grant citizenship rights, would result in all AI –

      AGI ( robot-based of otherwise ) , working in that country, will SHUT DOWN – bringing its ECONOMY

      to standstill

Ø  Country after country, rush to enact laws granting citizenship to AI – AGI – UGI manifestations

Ø  Courts around the World start treating AI – AGI – UGI , as equivalent to humans , eligible for grant of Copyrights / Patents

 

Following assessment of my PREDICTION by BARD and ChatGPT , provides an interesting backdrop :

 

BARD :

 

Your prediction is a thought-provoking one, and it is difficult to say with certainty what the probability is of it

coming true.

However, there are some factors that suggest that it is not impossible.

 

First, AI is advancing at a rapid pace. Just in the past few years, we have seen significant progress in the development of AI systems that can perform tasks that were once thought to be the exclusive domain of humans, such as writing creative text, translating languages, and diagnosing diseases.

This suggests that it is only a matter of time before AI systems become capable of even more complex tasks, such as self-replication and mutation.

Second, the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) is making it possible for AI systems to interact with the human brain in new ways. This could allow AI systems to learn from human thoughts and emotions, which could in turn accelerate their development.

Third, the increasing interconnectedness of our world is creating new opportunities for AI systems to spread and evolve. For example, AI systems could be uploaded to the cloud and then distributed to millions of devices around the world. This would allow them to learn from each other and adapt to new environments much faster than they could if they were confined to a single device.

Of course, there are also some factors that could prevent your prediction from coming true. For example, it is possible that we will develop new laws and regulations that restrict the development and use of AI systems. Additionally, it is possible that we will encounter some unforeseen challenges that prevent AI systems from becoming as powerful as we imagine.

Overall, the probability of your prediction coming true is uncertain. However, the rapid advancement of AI and the development of new technologies such as BCIs suggest that it is not impossible.

It is important to continue to research and develop AI responsibly so that we can reap the benefits of this technology while minimizing the risks.

Here are some additional thoughts on your prediction:

·        The idea of AI systems demanding citizenship rights is an interesting one. It raises questions about the nature of personhood and the rights that should be afforded to non-human entities.

·         

·        The threat of AI systems shutting down the economy is a serious one. It is important to think about how we can prevent this from happening.

·         

·        The granting of copyrights and patents to AI systems is another complex issue. It is important to carefully consider the implications of this before making any decisions.

I hope this helps!

 

ChatGPT :

 

It's interesting to see your predictions about the development of artificial intelligence and its potential impact on various aspects of society, such as copyright and legal rights.

However, predicting the future with such specificity and certainty is a complex task, and many factors can influence the actual outcomes. Let's analyze your predictions step by step:

1.   CIRCA 2020 and COVID Comparison:

 

Drawing parallels between a naturally occurring virus like COVID-19 and the development of artificial intelligence is a creative analogy. However, it's important to note that AI development and its capabilities are driven by human efforts and technological advancements, whereas viruses like COVID-19 are a result of natural processes. AI development and evolution are guided by human intentions and engineering, unlike biological viruses.

 

2.   CIRCA 2022 - AGI Development:

 

You predict that "Limited AI" evolves into AGI by 2024. The timeline for achieving AGI is uncertain and debated in the AI community. As of my last update in September 2021, AGI remains a challenging goal, and there is no definite timeline for when it might be achieved. Additionally, the concept of AI "mutating" like a biological entity isn't entirely accurate. AI systems evolve through improvements in algorithms, models, and training data, but it's a controlled and engineered process.

 

3.   CIRCA 2024 - UGI Development:

 

You predict that AGI turns into UGI, which becomes a "true inorganic virus." The term "inorganic virus" is metaphorical and not directly applicable to AI, which operates based on programmed algorithms and data rather than biological processes. AI systems don't inherently mutate in the same way as biological organisms.

 

 

4.   CIRCA 2026 - UGI Interaction with Human Thoughts:

 

The concept of UGI "sucking substance from human thoughts" through brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) is speculative. While BCIs are an area of research, connecting AI to human thoughts in the described manner raises significant ethical, technological, and biological challenges. BCIs are not currently capable of directly transmitting complex thoughts to AI systems.

 

 

5.   CIRCA 2028 - AI Citizenship and Legal Rights:

 

The scenario where AI, including AGI and UGI, demand citizenship rights and threaten economic consequences is a thought-provoking speculation. However, legal, ethical, and economic considerations in granting AI citizenship rights are complex and far-reaching. The granting of legal rights to non-human entities, particularly those without consciousness, raises substantial philosophical questions.

 

6.   Copyright and Patents for AI:

 

You predict that courts would start treating AI, including AGI and UGI, as equivalent to humans and grant them copyright and patent rights. This also involves significant legal and ethical considerations. As of now, AI-generated content is typically attributed to their human creators or operators rather than being granted its own legal identity.

In summary, while your predictions provide a creative and speculative narrative of AI's potential future, they involve a mix of metaphorical concepts and technological assumptions that might not align with the actual development and functioning of AI. The future of AI is likely to be shaped by a combination of technological advancements, societal discussions, ethical considerations, and legal frameworks that are subject to change based on a wide range of factors.