Liar vs Liar ?
---------------------
I
have seen the movie , “ Kramer vs Kramer
“ and the play “ Gandhi
vs Gandhi “
But
I do not remember , either the themes or the dialogues
But
I wish I was able to retain a versatile / erudite “ Liar “ to plead my case in
the Supreme Court in 1984 , when I lost a case to my landlord for retaining
possession of flat rented from him
That
human Lawyer who I engaged, did a rather poor job of arguing / presenting my
case
If
I run into a similar litigation in 2024 , I will not have to worry
Instead
of a “ Lawyer “ , I would retain a “ Liar “ [ - an Artificial Intelligence legal luminary
AVATAR ]
Here
is the reason for my optimism :
Highlights :
·
IBM recently unveiled a
new artificial intelligence system that can craft lengthy, persuasive arguments during a debate.
·
At the show [ CES ], it presented arguments both for and against
making gambling illegal.
It later did the same for the idea of developing autonomous cars.
·
Project
Debater does
little writing of its own — the AI system’s core strength comes from categorizing and
analyzing the arguments fed
into it by humans.
·
The algorithm scans short human-written arguments on a potential debate
topic for specific keywords and language….
·
Then it groups those arguments by topic, determines
whether they’re for or against the proposal, and organizes a speech based on the arguments it
analyzed.
=========================================================
Apparently
, I was not too far off in envisioning the arrival of “ Project
Debater “ , when some 10 months ago , I imagined it to deliver a judgement
on Aadhar privacy issue , as described at (
- of course , drafted by me – a human ! ):
Nightmare
? [ 04 March 2018 ]
Any immediate practical
application ?
Of
course , hiding in plain sight !
Over
past few decades , dozens of lawyers have argued in various courts re the
Ayodhya /
Ram Mandir case
By
now , millions of words have been recorded in court records – both for and
against
If
requested , IBM would be too happy to feed these millions of “ words / phrases
/ sentences / paragraphs
“ into its Project
Debater , pitching TWO LIARS against each other !
Then
upload those “LIAR ARGUMENTS“ on its web site . May be even a DRAFT judgement !
Won’t
that be a hugely “ Face
Saving Formula “ for all the parties
concerned , who have repeatedly proclaimed their intention to “ abide by the
Supreme Court verdict “ ?
And
for a bonus : Party losing 2019 elections can always blame “ Artificial
Intelligence “ !
=====================================================
12
Jan 2019
Rsvp
: hcp@RecruitGuru.com
No comments:
Post a Comment