Kailas,
This table can also be read as follows :
Tariff....................... Minimum...........................Maximum
7 p........................ 50,000 ( Rs 3,500
)............. 250,000 ( Rs 17,500 )
6.25 p................ 250,000 ( Rs 15,625
)............500,000 ( Rs 31,250 )
4.5 p ..................500,000 ( Rs 22,500
)............10,00,000 ( Rs 45,000 )
3 p ................... 10,00,000 ( Rs 30,000
)...........20,00,000 ( Rs 60,000 )
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This raises following questions :
# Depending upon the slab selected , same no of 250,000
emails can cost us ,
Rs 17,500 ............in 7p slab
or
Rs 15,625 ................in 6.25 p
slab
Why this anomaly ?
# Validity
is only 12 months
That means any unutilized amount ( no ) at
the end of 12 months , lapses !
This is NOT acceptable , since we
are just launching our web site and have NO CLUE as
to how many Subscribers will register and
how many emails will they blast
Irrespective
of how long it takes , we should be able to FULLY utilize the full quantum of
the emails purchased
# 100 Kb limit to the size of the Email
To best of my memory , in B2B , we have kept
the limit to 5,000 characters for a Marketing Message ( Shuklendu to
check )
This translates into how many KB ?
If need be , we must work backward and re-fix
the limit to some safe no of characters that do NOT exceed 100 Kb
# The " SLAB SYSTEM " forces us to decide " Which " slab
we should select , every time we consume the purchased package
To do this , we need to guesstimate how many
emails are likely to get blasted during the course of the following 12 months
To remain on the safe side ( ie ; not
OVER-COMMIT ), we will always " tend " to choose a lower slab ( by
" No of Emails " )
We will think ,
" If we consume these many emails , in ,
( say ) 7 months , we can always buy again another 50 ,000 at 7 p "
So , the downside of " Conservatism " [ or lack of
our ability to predict / estimate accurately ], is that we will end up ,
buying the 7p slab , again and again ! That works to the advantage of
Netcore !
Ideal method ( from our point of view ) will be that the moment
we " cross " the Upper Limit of any slab and our cumulative consumption,
till that date, enters into the next higher slab , the lower " Rate per
Email " kicks in !
Much like ( but inverse of ) our Personal Income Tax slabs
I would request you to visit Netcore office , along with Divyesh , to
discuss these aspects with their sales team and convince them of our points
Feel free to seek help from Raju / Shuklendu
hcp
From: Kailas Patil
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:05 AM
To: Divyesh Shah
Cc: Hemen Parekh
Subject: FW: Emailing: Email Service Proposal - netCORE
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 10:05 AM
To: Divyesh Shah
Cc: Hemen Parekh
Subject: FW: Emailing: Email Service Proposal - netCORE
Dear Divyesh,
Please find the attached Email
Service Proposal (tariff) of netcore.
Regards,
Kailas Patil
From: karan mehta
[mailto:karan.mehta@netcore.co.in]
Sent: 15 February 2014 PM 01:13
To: Kailas Patil
Cc: Dipti - Hunters @ netCORE
Subject: Emailing: Email Service Proposal - netCORE
Sent: 15 February 2014 PM 01:13
To: Kailas Patil
Cc: Dipti - Hunters @ netCORE
Subject: Emailing: Email Service Proposal - netCORE
Dear Kailas,
Further to the demo given for the mass mailing service (EMM & Falconide), please find attached the financial proposal.
Kindly let me know how we can take this ahead from here.
Further to the demo given for the mass mailing service (EMM & Falconide), please find attached the financial proposal.
Kindly let me know how we can take this ahead from here.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment