Dear Aditya,
I hope this reaches you . An acknowledgement would tell me
Today, I also sent to you, a tweet-message
Should you desire, I can include your email ID in my mailing list for ECONOMIC REFORMS ( see below )
Regards,
Hemen parekh
Andheri – Mumbai
( M ) 98,67,55,08,08
______________________________
From: Hemen Parekh [mailto:hcp@recruitguru.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2019 11:55 AM
To: 'Cabinet Minister 2019'; 'Chief Minister 2019'; 'Loksabha2019'; 'BJP National Executive'; 'Editors'; 'TV Anchors'; 'Business Leader'; 'Indian Think Tanks'; 'TIMESjourno'; 'DNAjourno'; 'amitabh.kant@nic.in'; 'vch-niti@gov.in';
Cc: 'L&T G K Apte'; 'Pradeep Talpade'; 'Haridas Shenoy'; 'V H Iyer'; 'Gurudatt Kundapurkar'; 's_railkar@hotmail.com'; 'abhinandan.pm75@gmail.com'
Subject: RE: ATTN : SHRI HON CJI BOBDEJI
08 Dec 2019
Here is one way to raise people's confidence in our judiciary, where there are 35 million pending Court Cases , of which more than 10 % are pending for more than 15 years !
Justice Delayed is Justice Denied https://lnkd.in/f-VzAyf
Here is a way to speed up the delivery of justice I urge readers to forward this email to CJI Hon Shri S A Bobdeji
Congratulations, Hon CJI , Shri S A Bobdeji ,
Upon your appointment as CJI
And , with a request to re-consider your following views :
[ source : Justice delayed is Justice Denied / 12 Sept 2018 ]
Where you are supposed to have said :
“ We are here on the way of trial being conducted through WhatsApp. This cannot be done .
What kind of a trial is this ? Is this a kind of joke ? “
Here is why I urge you to reconsider your views on conducting internet-based trials :
Highlights :
Ø China has unveiled a new system of digital justice with artificial-intelligence judges, cyber-courts, and verdicts delivered on chat apps.
Ø Already handled more than three million legal cases or other judicial procedures since its launch in March
Ø an online interface with litigants appearing by video chat as an AI judge - complete with on-screen avatar - that prompts them to present their cases
Ø 'Does the defendant have any objection to the nature of the judicial blockchain evidence submitted by the plaintiff?'
- the black-robed virtual judge sitting under China's national emblem asked in a pre-trial meeting.
'No objection,' a human plaintiff answered.
Ø Litigants can register their civil complaints online and later log on for their court hearing.
Ø '[ Concluding cases ] at a faster speed is a kind of justice, because justice delayed is justice denied,' Hangzhou Internet Court Vice President Ni Defeng said
Ø Ni added that the use of blockchain technology was particularly useful, helping to streamline and create clearer records of the legal process.
Ø Together, they have accepted a total of 118,764 cases, and concluded 88,401, the Supreme People's Court said
Ø The 'mobile court' option on WeChat - China's leading social-media messaging platform - allows users to complete case filings, hearings, and evidence exchange without physically appearing in court
==============================
In my above-mentioned blog [ sent to Supreme Court as an email ], I had suggested :
Launch online portal……..www.OnlineJustice.
Interfaces :
# Who can register a litigation and how ( detailed form to be filled in )
# What kind of complaints can be filed ( Eg; property / divorce / fraud / loans etc )
# Time frame of hearings ( based on backlog at that point )
# Search / Selection of “ empanelled lawyers “ ( with their fees tariff )
# Method of conducting “ Online Trial “ ( Audio – Video Conference calls )
# Online payment of Court Fees / Lawyer’s fees
# Who can “ watch “ the online trial and how ( Video broadcast ) and when
# Progress Chart as trial proceeds / Upload – Download of documents
# Court Room allotted ( by software ) to each litigation
Not being limited by any “ Physical Constraints “ , it will be possible ( for the
software ), to open as many “ Virtual / Online “ Court Rooms as required
Only limitation will be the number of available Judges at any given time
# And as far as finding 10,000 Judges to conduct “ Online Trials “ from the comfort of
their homes ( and without imposing any “ Infrastructure Burden “ on the State –
except providing them with a fast broadband connection ) , I suggest that we rope in
retired judges on a “ Per Case Retainer “ basis ( paid into their Jan Dhan accounts )
# There must be a “ Bonus cum Penalty “ formula to govern the payments to the
Judges , depending upon the “ Actual Time “ taken to dispose off a given case as
against the “Target Time “ ( to be computed by Artificial Intelligent Software , based on
historical data being continuously compiled for all the cases , once the portal gets
launched )
I urge Chief Justice Hon Deepak Misraji to treat this email as a PIL and “ direct “ the
NDA government to initiate action on this suggestion ( I cannot afford a lawyer ! )
Your " Activism " in this matter will go a long way to restore the faith of the ordinary citizens in the judiciary !
I rest my case !
With regards,
Hemen Parekh
==============================
08 Dec 2019
hcp@RecruitGuru.com
ReplyReply allForward |
No comments:
Post a Comment