Dear Friends,
Thanks for continuing your efforts to get the protestors to vacate Saheen Bagh
Crowd said :” Nahi ho sakta “
You said : “ We are not here to debate the law itself . If we don’t find a solution despite our best efforts, the matter will go back to court. Then there will no longer be any other option. The government will do what it has to do. We want women protestors to pay attention to this “
I hope you will not give up , considering that the “ Fine Art of Negotiations “ consists of :
· > Give and Take / Compromise
You win some – you lose some. Agreement cannot be entirely on your own terms.
· > Face Saving Formula / A Win-Win Situation
No party must feel having “ lost – out “
· > Deal with Devil / Never walk-out
You don’t decide who shall represent opposite party
· > Red Herring
Some demands get included in a “ Charter of Demands “, only to divert your attention. These always get dropped
later.
· > Negotiate / Negotiate / Negotiate
You cannot adopt a “ Take it or Leave it “ attitude
· > Don’t be in a hurry to settle
If you exhibit a sense of extreme urgency, it will be treated as your weakness and taken advantage of.
· > Never give an empty threat
Opposite party may call your bluff !
· > Never say “ Never “ !
You may have to eat your words.
· > Do not go public
Never reveal what is shared with you in “confidence“
With regards,
Hemen parekh
From: Hemen Parekh [mailto:hcp@recruitguru.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 9:23 AM
To: 'ramachandran.sadhana@gmail.
Cc: ''supremecourt@nic.in' (supremecourt@nic.in)'; 'SupremeBarAssociation (SupremeBarAssociation@
Subject: RE: CAA COMPROMISE SOLUTION
Dear Friends,
Yesterday , I saw you on TV, explaining to the crowd at Saheen Bagh, Supreme Court’s views on “ peaceful protests being a fundamental right “
I also listened to some young man saying : Negotiations must be conducted in the presence of the media
This is not desirable , since you have no control over how the media will report the progress of the negotiations . Chances are , distortion !
It is also also impossible to be able to “ negotiate “ with a crowd of 500
Protesters must nominate a team of 5 persons who are “ empowered / authorized “ to negotiate on behalf of the protestors and whose deal ( with the interlocutors ) , will be binding on them
With regards,
Hemen parekh
From: Hemen Parekh [mailto:hcp@recruitguru.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 7:23 PM
To: 'ramachandran.sadhana@gmail.
Cc: 'supremecourt@nic.in' (supremecourt@nic.in); SupremeBarAssociation (SupremeBarAssociation@
Subject: CAA COMPROMISE SOLUTION
Smt Sadhana Ramachandran
Shri Wajahat Habibullah
Shri Sanjay Hegde
Dear Friends,
Supreme Court has asked you to mediate ( ? ) with the anti-CAA protesters occupying Saheen Baug
No doubt, you would need to offer them some “ modification “ in the wordings of CAA, which will convince them that CAA is not going to adversely affect their citizenship
Following is my suggestion for “ Re-worded “ clauses of CAA , which I believe, will be a COMPROMISE which protesters will accept
If they do, you may recommend to the Supreme Court to direct the Central Government to consider it
CAA Compromise : With Malice towards None ……………………………[ 22 Jan 2020 ]
With regards,
Hemen Parekh
Mumbai
No comments:
Post a Comment