When it comes to finding a solution for Ayodhya / Ram Mandir
dispute, that is acceptable to ALL - and it is also a FACE SAVING solution - ,
Supreme Court may have no alternative than to go ahead and appoint a panel of
MEDIATORS , on its own
( I have suggested 4 names to SC and to the parties concerned
)
Dear Hon Justice Bobdeji ,
Everybody has thrown the ball in your court !
Time to play !
=====================================================================================
We can do…….
And
we must
While
hearing the Ayodhya dispute case yesterday, Hon Justice Bobde said :
“
We have no control over the past . We can only do something
about what exists in the present , that is the dispute “
Sources
:
[ A ]
Shri
Tushar Mehta ( tusharmehta.asg@gmail.com
) – Solicitor General for UP , said :
“
The court should refer the matter for mediation only when there exists an
element of settlement “
[ B ]
Senior
advocate, C S Vaidyanathan ,
appearing
for Ram Lalla Virajman, said :
“
In a case of this nature, when Ayodhya is accepted as Ram Janmbhoomi, if any
mediation is to take place, nobody can agree to some other place as Ram
Janmsthan
That
is non-negotiable.
Only
thing to negotiate is an alternate place for a mosque. For this, we will be
willing to crowdsource funds. This practically ended any scope for negotiation
before it could begin
Mediation
has not yielded any results in the past despite repeated attempts “
[ C ]
“
There is no difference between court adjudicated verdict or a compromise which
would
result
in a decree
Both would be binding on the parties
I would go one step further and suggest that it should be contempt of court if
anyone
reported about developments in the mediation process “
Muslim
Bodies supported the court’s suggestion of mediation and said it should be done
in-camera and nobody should be allowed to disclose the proceedings till the
final report is given ( - like locking up the members of the jury in
a room ? Possible )
[ D ]
Supreme
Court :
#
Asked all the parties concerned for the names of possible mediators for
reaching an
amicable settlement . “ Give names of mediators by today. We will pass orders
shortly .
Instead of one mediator, there could be a panel of mediators to thrash out the
issue “
#
Media need not talk about what efforts are going on and what developments have
taken
place. We are considering whether it should be reported at all. It will not be
a gag order
but there should be confidentiality of the mediation process
#
Justice Chandrachud said :
It could be difficult to ensure secrecy of the mediation process. In the event
of reaching a
compromise, could it be binding on the public, who are not parties to the case
?
#
Justice Bobde said :
“ You are pre-judging it .
We are trying for mediation because it is not about a land dispute but involves
sentiments
and faith of people
We are conscious of the gravity and importance of the dispute and its impact on
the
body polity of the country
It is all about mind, heart and feelings. But the law mandates that the court
try and
heal the minds and hearts.
We cannot understand how anyone can reject it outright
Desirability of a negotiated settlement cannot be ignored
Why do you presume that you have to compromise ?
[ E ]
Dr
Subramanian Swamy ( swamy39@gmail.com
) said :
“
Any compromise must be within certain parameters – that all the land belongs to
the
Government and can be given to anyone to construct a temple “
=========================================================
From
yesterday’s proceedings, the following is apparent :
#
By reaching a “ negotiated settlement “ , all parties are afraid
of being accused of a “
Sell Out “ by their respective constituencies !
Eg : “ If this is what you
managed to get, why did you play with our feelings for 70
years ? “
#
They would all like to “ Save their faces “ by having someone else (
even Supreme Court
or a panel of mediators ) hand out a
decision , so that they can say , “ What can we do ?
We tried our level best ! We have
to obey the law of the land “
# They may not give names of any mediator/s , and
start a new round of “ negotiations “
in respect of the panel members !
They would feel “ relieved “ if the Supreme
Court selects those mediators on its own
[ I have given 4 names of eminent
persons in my earlier mail ]
#
Supreme Court itself may be wanting to hand out a decree along the lines of my email
[ A
Home for Ram ]
but may not want to appear “ arbitrary – biased –
dictatorial “
For SC as well , it is necessary to
appear “ Rational
“ by adopting a well established
legal process !
=========================================================
Dear
Tushar
Mehta / C S Vaidyanathan / Rajeev Dhavan / Subramanian Swamy :
I
urge you to enable “ Birth of Peace “ in Ayodhya , as described in :
Reach - Out Time ? -
20 Sept 2013
Sarva Dharma Sthanam ? 02 Oct 2017
Let Ram’s Ayodhya be Secular
31 Jan 2019
=========================================================
07
March 2019
Rsvp
: hcp@RecruitGuru.com
From: Hemen Parekh
[mailto:hcp@recruitguru.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 5:54 PM
To: 'Cabinet Ministers'; 'BJP National Executive'; 'psfs@mea.gov.in'; 'Rajeev.kher@ris.org.in'; 'Sanjeev@sanjeevsanyal.com'; 'Pulak.ghosh@iimb.ac.in'; 'ictsd@ictsd.ch'; 'amb-indiawto@nic.in'; 'rajiv@luthra.com'; 'Editors'; 'cb@cii.in'; 'prakash.j@sansad.nic.in'; 'Loksabha1'; 'Loksabha2'; 'Rajyasabha'; 'manifesto@inc.in'; 'anjumaniislam@rediffmail.com'; 'anju@mitpune.com'; 'mit@mitpune.com'; 'vinayakkulkarni@mitid.edu.in'; 'rahulkarad@mitsog.org'; 'sunilkarad@mitpune.com'; 'vdkarad@mitpune.com'; 'swamy39@gmail.com'; 'ajay@artofliving.org'; 'secretariat@artofliving.org'; 'rakesh.sinha46@sansad.nic.in'; 'drsnpathan@gmail.com'; 'dgicm_nagpur@yahoo.com'; 'rajmohan.gandhi@gmail.com'; 'upministers@recruitguru.com'
Cc: 'ssbhalla@gmail.com'; 'bibek.debroy@gov.in'; 'ashima@igidr.ac.in'; 'rr1@nipfp.org.in'; 'ratanp.watal@gov.in'; 'ceo-niti@nic.in'; 'Indian Think Tanks'; 'Gurudatt Kundapurkar'; 'Haridas Shenoy'; 'Pradeep Talpade'; 'amit.doshi@dbcorp.in'; 'amitabh.kant@nic.in'; 'admin@narendramodi.in'; 'BJP-Dept-Heads'; 'Indrajit Sethi'; 'vch-niti@gov.in'; 'blchangemakers@thehindu.co.in'; 'ADR'; 'amitshah.bjp@gmail.com'; 'TIMESjourno'; 'DNAjourno'; 'assocham@nic.in'; 'ficci@ficci.com'; 'Economics'; 'Business Leader'; 'TV Anchors'; 'Chartered Accountant Institute Members'; 'Cost Accountants Institute Members'; hcp@RecruitGuru.com
Subject: LET THERE BE A NEW DAWN OF PEACE
After a Surgical / Non-Military / Preemptive , AIR strike, on
a Foreign soil, it is time for a :
Healing / Humanitarian / Pra-active , GROUND strike , on
Indian soil !
It is time to implement the dream of a secular India that
Bapu cherished his entire life
For Bapu, Ram lived in the hearts of millions - no matter
where they lived
A Home for Ram
Past :
In
Ismail Faruqui judgement on Oct 24, 1994 ,
the SC upheld validity of acquisition of Ayodhya land but had said :
“
This is a matter suited essentially to a RESOLUTION
BY NEGOTIATIONS which does not
end
in a winner or loser ; while adjudication leads to that end
It
is in the NATIONAL INTEREST that
there is NO LOSER , at the end of the
process
This can be achieved by a NEGOTIATED SOLUTION on
the basis of which a decree can be
obtained in terms of such solution in these suits
Unless
a solution is found which leaves EVERY ONE
HAPPY , there cannot be beginning for
a continued HARMONY between ‘ We The People of India ‘ “
Present :
On
26 Feb 2019 , while hearing the Ayodhya
title suit, Supreme Court urged for a “ mediated
solution “
Justice
S A Bobde said :
“
These are title suits which do not involve private property . It involves
public right to
Worship
Section 89 of the CPC provides for court-mandated resolution
of dispute through mediation
We are considering it seriously. We would like to have it even if there is 1 %
chance of
Success
We would like to know WHO ARE THE PERSONS who can
mediate
It
shall be strictly confidential
Where it appears to the court that there exist ELEMENTS
OF A SETTLEMENT which may be
acceptable to the parties, the court shall formulate the terms of settlement
and give them
to the parties for their observations and after receiving the observations of
the parties, the
court
may reformulate the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for
arbitration,
conciliation, judicial settlement including settlement through Lok Adalat , or
mediation
“
Future :
At the disputed Ayodhya site , creation of a “ World Peace Complex “ comprising of :
·
Ram
Temple ( for Hindus )
·
Mosque
( for Muslims )
·
Church
( for Christians )
·
Temple
( for Buddhists )
·
Synagogue
( for Jews )
·
Akshar-Dham
( for Jains )
·
Gurudwara
( for Shikhs )
·
University
for Comparative Studies of World Religions
o
Hospitals ( like Netralaya /
Hridayalaya )
o
India
Heritage / History Museum
·
Business
Convention-cum-Industry Exhibition Centre
·
Tourist Complex
· And
right in the center of the complex , a giant statue of the “ Father of the Nation “
{
Source : Reach - Out
Time ? - 20 Sept 2013 }
Persons who can mediate
:
# Dr Vishwanath Karad (
Chairman , Peace University )
# Aamir
Khan
( Actor / Social Worker )
# Malala
Yousafzai (
Nobel Peace Prize Winner / Terror Victim )
Message from
India :
Entire world is
engulfed with violence . Militants and terrorists are killing innocent people
everywhere .
Persons with no knowledge of the non-violent teachings of the
various
religions, are inciting hatred among
people, in the name of religions
Among all these , we plan to construct at
the disputed site, a WORLD
PEACE COMPLEX ,
which will stand for respect for all
religions and harmonious living for entire mankind
References :
· Let
Ram’s Ayodhya be Secular [
31 Jan 2019
]
·
· Sarva
Dharma Sthanam
?
[ 02 Oct
2017 ]
This blog sent to :
I urge all those who support my suggestion
to forward this mail to the Supreme Court
======================================================
27 feb 2019
Rsvp ; hcp@RecruitGuru.com
No comments:
Post a Comment