Milan Vaishnav got it right !
---------------------------------
Rest
are barking up the wrong tree !
Today’s
Hindustan Times carries following news report :
Proposal in nutshell :
“The Commission has proposed to the law
ministry that a ceiling may be stipulated on election
expenditure by political parties towards Parliamentary or
Assembly elections.
It had proposed that such ceiling should be
either 50% of or not more than the expenditure ceiling limit provided for the
candidate multiplied by the number of candidates of the party
contesting the election.”
Milan Vaishnav(mvaishnav@gmail.com
/https:milanvaishnav.com ) commented as follows :
“The loophole on party expenditure has made
individual limits on spending farcical. The issue is with enforcement.
Given the difficulties of monitoring and
enforcement, it is not clear how limits on parties will be more efficacious
than limits on candidates.
I would prefer a situation where contributions were made more transparent and spending limits were relaxed. But the government has made
the former ever more opaque,”
My misgivings :
If this goes through , is it likely that each
party may ask more than one of its members to contest each seat ? May be 10
party-candidates for each seat ?
But this is so obvious that the finally
accepted proposal will also limit that each party can put up only ONE candidate
per seat . No brainer !
The root cause of all the “ extravagant / un-documented / un-reported “ , election related expenses is :
Un-accounted / Un-restricted ( BLACK MONEY financed ) PARTY-FUNDING
As I had feared , recently introduced ELECTORAL BONDS have
miserably failed in addressing this fundamental / structural WEAKNESS ( -
some say intentional loophole )
The only foolproof way to rectify this
situation and make it totally transparent is to implement my following
suggestion ( sent as Email to Cabinet Ministers / NITI Aayog / PM-EAC /
Election Commissioner / Political Party Chiefs etc ) , is :
Transparency
in Political Funding ? [ 06 July 2017 ]
No comments:
Post a Comment