Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Friday, 24 November 2023

TO DISPOSE OFF 44 MILLION COURT-CASES IN 24 MONTHS ? HERE IS HOW

 

JUST is the Answer

 

JUST =  Judgment  Using  Software  Technology

 

For the record, the National Judicial Data Grid states :

Ø  There are 5.75 million cases pending in the high courts and 38.15 million in the District courts across India

Ø  Of these, more than 4.5 million cases have been pending for more than 10 years

 

Question :

Ø  How do dispose off these cases in ( say ) 2 years ?

 

Answer :

Ø  Through simultaneous leveraging of following technologies :

#   Virtual / Online / E-Courts

#   Artificial Intelligence ( AI ) software

 

Ø  In my following blogs / e-mails, I had outlined how we can start ( say ), 10,000 E – COURTS , presided over ( from the comfort of their homes– “ Work From Home “ model ) by 10,000 RETIRED judges :

 

Ø  Justice delayed is Justice Denied ……………………….[ 12 Sept 2018 ]

 

            Extract :

Ø  If we want to reduce the average “case disposal time “ from 6 YEARS to 6 MONTHS, we must do better than the Chinese–as follows :

 

 First :

Launch online portal.www.OnlineJustice.gov.in having following features / pages / User Interfaces : ( Details at link above )

         

   Next : 

 

Give these (Work-From–Home ) e-court judges, JUST as described in following news report :

 

Court verdict in a jiffy? AI could be answer, says IIT Kanpur research  / TOI  /  16 July 2021

 

       Extract :

Ø  Can a judgment be delivered in seconds?  An IIT Kanpur’s research paper says, AI could be the answer

 

Ø  A team of researchers led by Ashutosh Modi and Arnab Bhattacharya at IIT-K’s computer Science Department  developed a system that not only predicts what should be the final decision of a court case but also how one arrives at that decision


Ø  An AI-enabled automated system that can assist judges by suggesting the outcome of an on-going court case may help in expediting the judicial process

 

Ø  For this, they have created a new corpus of 35,000 legal documents from the Supreme Court  ( SC ) ; the Indian Legal Documents Corpus ( ILDC )

 

Ø  The research paper titled “ Indian Legal Documents Corpus based Court  Judgment Prediction and Explanation ( CJPE ) “ states that the advent of AI-enabled technology brings “ hope to the legal system “

 

Ø  “ This is one of the first Indian Legal Corpus of SC cases created for case prediction and explanation. Moreover, this is an on-going process and the corpus is being actively built. The ILDC is created and annotated with court decisions. A portion of the Corpus ( a separate test set ) is annotated with gold standard explanations by legal experts “ said Arnab Bhattacharya, professor of Computer Science at IIT-K

 

Ø  The next step is Court Judgment Prediction, for this specialized deep learning based models are developed

 

Ø  Prediction is followed by an explanation for the decision, using unsupervised algorithms. Explanations given by algorithm are compared with the explanations annotated by legal experts

 

Ø  The goal of this model is to assist the legal community and not replace judges.

 

Ø  “ The AI model can augment the process and bring about faster decision making, allowing for clearing up cases “, added Bhattacharya

 

RESEARCHERS :

 

Ø  Ashutosh Modi ( IIT-K , Computer Science Department ) 

    [ ashutosh@coli.uni-saaeland.de ]

 

Ø  Arnab Bhattacharya ( IIT-K, Computer Science Department ) 

    [  arnabb@iitk.ac.in  ]

 

Ø  Prof. Kripa Ghosh

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research – Kolkata 

 

kripaghosh@iiserkol.ac.in  ]

 

 

 

 

Ø  Prof. Shouvik Guha

West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences  

 

shouvikkumarguha@nujs.edu ]

 

 

Related Readings :

 

Ø  Liar vs Liar ?  ……………………………..[  11 Jan 2019 ]

 

    Extract :

 

Ø          IBM recently unveiled a new artificial intelligence system that can craft

            lengthy, persuasive arguments during a debate.

 

Ø         Project Debater does little writing of its own — the AI system’s core strength

           comes from categorizing and analyzing the arguments fed into it by humans.

 

 

  The algorithm scans short human-written arguments on a potential debate topic

  for specific keywords and language….

 

 

Ø  AI come to judgement ? Not for a while ! …………[ 17 Dec 2019 ]

 

       Extract :

Ø             Referring to the cautionary words in the speech by former CJI R M Lodha,

               who presided over the function, on use of AI, Justice Bobde said,

  

Ø            “I wish to point out that it is not an attempt to introduce AI in the decision-

               making process itself.

 

Ø             The system we are looking at has the ability to read 10 lakh words per

                second, which means you can make it read anything and ask it any

                question and it will give you the answer.

 

Ø              The Ayodhya case had thousands of pages of documents and it becomes

                very easy when you have AI.

 

Ø             There is no thought of substituting decision-making by human minds with

                computers…”

 

 

Ø  See You Out of Court ……………………………………….[ 11 Jan 2020 ]

 

       Extract :

           That is the title of an article ( authored by Indulekha Arvind ), in today’s

           Economic Times ( Magazine ). Online version can be found at :

     

           Online dispute resolution is beginning to find takers in India  



Ø  Law : Nothing Artificial in Arbitration ……………………[ 16 Feb 2019 ]

 

      Extract :

            Chief Justice S A Bobde seems to think so, as per following report :

            Artificial Intelligence could help in arbitration in globalized era, says CJI 



Ø  Virtual Court Benchmarks ……………………………………[ 14 Jan 2021 ]

 

       Extract :

Ø             And as far as finding 10,000 Judges to conduct “ Online Trials “ from the 

          comfort of their homes ( and without imposing any “ Infrastructure Burden

          “ on  the State–except providing them with a fast broadband connection ),

           I suggest :

           we rope in retired judges ,

           on a “ Per Case Retainer “ basis ( paid into their Jan Dhan accounts )

          

               

Ø            There must be a “ Bonus cum Penalty “ formula to govern the payments to

              the Judges, depending upon the “Actual Time “  taken to dispose off a

              given case as against the “ Target Time “ ( to be computed by

              Artificial Intelligent Software , based on historical data being continuously

              compiled for all the cases , once the portal gets launched )

         

                    

          I urge  Chief Justice Hon Deepak Misraji to treat this email as a PIL and

          “ direct “  the NDA government to initiate action on this suggestion ( I

          cannot afford a  lawyer ! )

                  

 

Ø  Thanks Supreme Court for hearing my PIL …………….[ 26 Mar 2021 ]

 

        Extract :

Ø              The Supreme Court on Thursday in principle decided to resort  to the

                never used constitutional provision for engaging retired High Court

                judges to tackle the huge pendency in High Courts…

 

Ø             The CJI-led bench said since the retired judges would be given a specific

               tenure to adjudicate old cases and as they would be regarded as the

               junior-most in the hierarchy of the HC, it would not cause any heartburn

              among serving judges

 

          5L cases pending in HCs, SC set to recall retired judges/TNN/ 26 Mar 2021

 

 

Ø    24x7 e-Courts ? ………………………………………………………..[ 14 Apr 2021 ]

 

       Extract :

Ø              That is the only way to reduce :

 

                     Ø     Pending court cases from 3 crore to 3 lakhs

 

                     Ø     Ave pendency from 8 years to 8 weeks

 

Ø             Thank You, Supreme Court for moving towards this goal, as reported in :

          E-courts may let cases be filed 24/7 from anywhere 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Ø         Now, judges can take help of artificial intelligence  / TNN /  07  April  2021

 

       Extract :

 

             SUPACE > Supreme Court Portal for Assistance in Court efficiency  

 

         Justice Bobde said : 

 

Ø               We are not going to let the use of AI spill over to decision making. It will

                 fully retain the autonomy and discretion of judges to decide cases,

                 though at a much faster pace at which the readiness of information is

                 made available by AI

 

       I believe that an Artificial Intelligence System that decides the case, could

       be disastrous to judiciary.. It is not designed to take a decision but only to

       provide information asked "

 

================================================   

 

Dear Researchers :

 

 

What you have achieved so far is only a tiny SEED of a giant future FOREST

 

Following news-reports are a glimpse of “  The Shape of Things to Come “ – and it is unstoppable

 

Wishing you all success,

 

With regards,

 

Hemen Parekh  /  hcp@RecruitGuru.com  /  17 July 2021

 

================================================

 Ø  The Possible Implications of GPT-3 to the Business of Law …[ 16 Apr 2021 ]

 

     Extract :

 

     #   Document automation and text generation

     #   Legal research

     #   Language translation

     #   Privacy and confidentiality concerns

     #   Unfairness and biasness

 

 

Ø  Amazing New Chinese A.I.-Powered Language Model Wu Dao 2.0 Unveiled  /  11 June 2021

 

 

      Extract :

 

Ø  Would Wu Dao 2.0 pass this test ?

 

Ø  Perhaps. "Wu Dao 2.0 aims to enable machines to think like humans and

    achieve cognitive abilities beyond the Turing test," said Jie Tang, the lead

    researcher behind Wu Dao 2.0. If not Wu Dao 2.0, the rapid progress being

    made in the development of language models makes it clear that one will

    soon pass the Turing test.

 

Ø  "The way to artificial general intelligence is big models and big computer

      [sic]," BAAI chair Dr. Hongjiang Zhang added in a statement

 

      "What we are building is a power plant for the future of AI. With mega

      data, mega computing power, and mega models, we can transform data to

      fuel the AI  applications of the future."

No comments:

Post a Comment