Shuklendu / Nitin,
In your yesterday's mail , you pointed out that , in our Company
Database , many email Ids are wrong -
resulting in Non-Delivery / Bouncing
You also pointed out that , if Foreign ( Message Blaster )
Companies and/or DIPP realizes this , there could be a backlash
I agree
Of course , the best solution is what I have suggested to Shri
Kant , below
If the Company Database ( including the Email
IDs ) is provided by DIPP , they cannot complain !
We must await their response
But , if we are asked to continue with our own database (
acquired thru RSS feeds ) , then one thing is clear , viz:
In the " Email Alerts " ( when a
Foreign Company blasts its " We would like to talk to you " message )
, that we will send out to DIPP / Indian Consuls / State Industry Ministers etc
,
we will NOT provide email ids of the RECIPIENT
Indian Companies
We will just give , > Company Name >
Industry > City > State ( we will
need to add this field in Registration Form , if not done )
We may get away with this
But how can we get away with " Company
Names " that read like following ?
> Company that provides processing
services
> Confidential
> A
> Large Industrial Catering Company
> $ 20 billion Fortune 500 Company
> @Aidasinc
> A big Mnc Company
> A big MNC in Bangalore
> A CMM 5 level Company
> A fortune 100 company
> A fortune 40 global product development
Company
> A global company
> A large IT company
In the first instance , we need to eliminate such
Company Names from our database - descriptions which create serious doubts
about our database - and rightly so too !
And , having removed once , we
must ensure that , in future , such descriptions do NOT enter our database thru
RSS feeds
If it is not possible to carry out such " Elimination
" thru some software program , I am willing to remove/highlight such
descriptions MANUALLY , with help from
Tushar / Sanjivani
May be , if you send us a SAMPLE
database , consisting of , say , 10,000 records
and ,
we HIGHLIGHT such
anomalies manually ,
then , from these highlighted portions ,
you may be able to deduce some " Decision
Rules " , to apply to the rest of the 2.28 lakh records
Pl let me know your decision
hcp
From: Hemen Parekh
[mailto:hcp@recruitguru.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:10 AM
To: 'amitabh.kant@nic.in'; 'amitabhk87@yahoo.com'
Cc: 'ravinder.73@nic.in'
Subject: AGE OF COOPERATION
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 7:10 AM
To: 'amitabh.kant@nic.in'; 'amitabhk87@yahoo.com'
Cc: 'ravinder.73@nic.in'
Subject: AGE OF COOPERATION
Dear
Shri Kant ,
On
4th Dec , Ravinder wrote :
"
A number of suggestions made by you are already on cards and our agencies
are taking them up in a phased manner. Certain suggestions are difficult to
implement. For example, we cannot have a list
of companies without verifying the credentials "
Despite
my clarifications , if this apprehension persists , then I would be happy to
replace B2B's existing COMPANY DATABASE with any one of the
following :
>
Database of Companies compiled by Department of
Company Affairs / Registrar of Companies
>
Database of Companies available with Income Tax
Authority
As
far as these databases are concerned , there can be no doubt re ,
>
Accuracy
>
Uptodate-ness
>
Comprehensiveness ( 6 lakh records Vs 2.28 lakh
of B2B ? )
Sure
, there will be issues such as " Mapping
" ( establishing the equivalence ) between ,
>
Industry Nomenclature as provided in DCA database , and
>
52 Industry-Sectors listed in B2B database
But
these are minor issues , which we will overcome as we go along
Most
critical issue is :
As
in case of Japan , will we in India , learn to cooperate
/ collaborate between Government ( DIPP ) and Private Sector ( B2B ) ,
to raise our " Ease of Doing Business
" rank from 142 to 1
?
with
regards ,
hemen
parekh
0
- 98,67,55,08,08
No comments:
Post a Comment