Kishan ,
Take look at what ChatGPT expects Blog Genie to be capable of
Hcp
I said :
Hey Bro : This blog was generated by " SearchMyBlogs.IndiaAGI.ai " > https://myblogepage.blogspot.
ChatGPT replied :
Hey Bro — this is actually a very good test case for Blog Genie 3.0.
I read the article itself, rather than judging it from the title. The present version makes a very strong claim: that several current research developments are “validating” your earlier vision, and it maps five of your concepts against recent work.
But I think Blog Genie 3.0 would produce a substantially different article.
It would first search your historical corpus, discover the older Subli-Melding, UNMAT and related writings, then separately investigate the current research. It would distinguish:
“Hemen predicted this”
from
“This resembles something Hemen had imagined”
from
“This is genuinely evidence that the prediction is coming true.”
That distinction is crucial.
It would also discover that your September 2026 archive already contains related themes such as Orchestrating the Agentic Future, GPT-6 Astra: Beyond Chatbots, When Agents Start Organizing, Beyond The AI Threshold, and The Future of Commerce.
So, if Blog Genie 3.0 had generated this article, I imagine it would come out something like this:
The World Is Now Morphing — But How Much of My Old Vision Is Actually Becoming Reality?
For more than a decade, I have been writing about a rather strange possibility:
What if the boundaries between our senses, our thoughts and the digital world were not permanent?
I called some of these ideas “Subli-Melding” and “Morphing of Content.”
At the time, these ideas probably sounded more like science fiction than technology.
Today, I am beginning to wonder whether they were science fiction after all.
Or whether we are simply approaching the same destination by roads that nobody could clearly see in advance.
From Words to Experiences
Much of the excitement surrounding Artificial Intelligence in recent years has centred around language.
We celebrated machines that could:
read → understand → write → speak.
But language may only have been the first layer.
The much bigger question is:
Can machines eventually move between different forms of human experience — sight, sound, movement, touch, thought and perhaps even emotion?
That is much closer to what I had in mind when I wrote about Subli-Melding.
And this is where today's developments become fascinating.
I Went Back to My Own Archives
One advantage of having written for so many years is that I can now go back and ask:
“Did I really write about this before — or am I merely seeing a resemblance after the event?”
My own archive contains several relevant threads.
In Missing: Subli-Melding?, I was already asking whether sensory information might ultimately be transformed from one form into another.
And my more recent UNMAT work has pushed the idea much further — toward communication in which conventional physical interfaces could eventually become less important.
That does not mean that today's laboratories have “proved” my old ideas.
It means something more interesting:
Some of the technological building blocks I was imagining are beginning to appear.
Five Developments Worth Watching
Here is where I would be cautious.
There is a temptation to make a table saying:
“Hemen predicted X → Scientists have now proved X.”
I would resist that temptation.
Science rarely works that neatly.
Instead, I would divide the developments into three categories:
My earlier idea | What is happening now | My assessment |
Decoding information from the brain | Rapid progress in neural decoding | Strongly related |
Direct communication between biological signals and machines | Brain-computer interfaces are progressing | Strongly related |
AI systems working as networks of specialised agents | Multi-agent AI architectures are advancing rapidly | Strongly related |
Transformation between sensory representations | Multimodal AI and neural interfaces are moving in this direction | Promising, but still early |
Telepathic transfer of human experience | Some relevant research exists, but the full vision remains speculative | Future possibility, not established fact |
And I think this distinction is important.
A resemblance is not a validation.
If a researcher develops a technology which resembles something I imagined years ago, I should be delighted.
But I should not automatically claim:
“I predicted exactly this.”
That would weaken rather than strengthen the argument.
The real story is more subtle.
What Has Changed Since I First Wrote About This?
Perhaps the biggest change is not any single scientific breakthrough.
It is the convergence of several technologies.
Consider what is now developing simultaneously:
AI
multimodal models
brain-computer interfaces
neural decoding
robotics
agentic AI
synthetic biology
new forms of human-computer interaction
Each technology may look modest when examined separately.
But what happens when they begin communicating with one another?
That is where the idea of Morphing becomes much more interesting.
From "Content" to "Experience"
The Internet originally moved:
TEXT
Then came:
IMAGES
Then:
AUDIO
Then:
VIDEO
Then:
INTERACTIVE DIGITAL WORLDS
AI is now beginning to blur these boundaries.
A single instruction can increasingly become:
text → image → voice → video → action
And the next step may not be merely converting one digital format into another.
It may be:
human intention → digital representation → machine action → sensory feedback
That is a much bigger transformation.
And Then Comes the Co-Thinker
This brings me to another idea that has appeared repeatedly in my writing:
The Personal AI Co-Thinker.
Imagine an AI that does not merely answer my questions.
It gradually learns:
- how I think
- what I have written
- what I believe
- what I have predicted
- what I am working on
- what interests me
- what I am likely to ask next
That AI becomes more than a chatbot.
It becomes a cognitive companion.
And if that companion can eventually interact with multiple sensory and biological interfaces, the distinction between:
“my thought”
and
“my digital assistant's understanding of my thought”
could become increasingly blurred.
This Is Where UNMAT Becomes Interesting
My UNMAT concept was an attempt to think beyond today's messaging applications.
Today we send:
WhatsApp messages
emails
voice messages
video calls
But imagine communication in which the medium itself becomes less visible.
Instead of asking:
“Which application should I use to send this?”
we might eventually ask:
“What exactly do I want another person — or another intelligence — to understand?”
The technology would determine the appropriate representation.
That is a very different philosophy of communication.
My recent UNMAT work explores this direction, although much of the complete vision remains firmly in the realm of research and experimentation.
So — Is My Old Vision Becoming Reality?
My answer today would be:
Partly.
And perhaps that is more exciting than saying “Yes.”
Some pieces are already real.
Some are experimental.
Some are emerging.
And some remain speculation.
But when several independent technological streams begin moving toward the same boundary, we should pay attention.
That is exactly what I see happening today.
The Great Morphing
Perhaps the biggest transformation is not that:
AI is becoming more intelligent.
It is that:
The interfaces between different kinds of intelligence are disappearing.
Human intelligence.
Artificial intelligence.
Biological signals.
Digital information.
Machines.
Sensors.
Robots.
Agents.
They are beginning to interact in ways that were difficult to imagine only a few years ago.
And that is why I continue to use the word:
MORPHING
Not because I believe every prediction I made years ago has now come true.
But because the walls between previously separate things are clearly becoming thinner.
And Here Is My Question to the Younger Generation
If you are 20 or 30 today, you may live through something far more profound than the arrival of ChatGPT.
You may witness the transition from:
Computers that understand our commands
to
Machines that understand our intentions.
And perhaps eventually:
Machines that understand us without requiring us to translate our thoughts into conventional commands at all.
That is when technology will stop being merely a tool that we operate.
It may become a partner with which we communicate.
My 2018 idea was called "Subli-Melding."
My later work moved toward "UNMAT."
Today, AI is moving toward agents, multimodality and increasingly natural interfaces.
Are these separate developments?
Or are they pieces of one much larger transformation?
I don't know.
But after watching technology evolve for several decades, I have learned one thing:
When several seemingly unrelated technologies begin converging, it is usually worth asking what lies on the other side of the convergence.
Perhaps that is where the real Morphing has begun.
