Pandora’s Box ?
Wikipedia defines it
as follows :
In modern times an idiom has grown from it ,
meaning
·
"
A present which seems valuable but which in reality is a curse "
Could
Maharashtra Chief Minister, Shri Devendra Fadnavis have opened a Pandora’s Box
by granting reservation quota of 16 % to the Maratha community ?
Could
he have, possibly NOT EXPECTED the following ?
=================================
The state government's decision to grant reservations to
Marathas has led to a domino effect. Similar demands have been made by other
social groups like Brahmins, Dhangars, Banjaras, Bhoi, Ramoshis, Wadars seeking
fresh categorisation as backwards or a change in their category
======================================
Citing
Marathas, Hardik Patel revives Patidar quota demand, corners Congress, BJP
Patidar
OBC quota stir leader Hardik Patel on Wednesday put the ball in the
court of the opposition Congress to introduce a private member’s bill seeking
reservations in the Gujarat assembly in the wake of the reservation granted to
Maratha community in Maharashtra.
“If
the BJP in Maharashtra can grant reservations to Marathas through a bill, why
can’t the same can be done by the same party in Gujarat? And like the Shiv Sena
and the NCP supported the bill in Maharashtra, the BJP and Congress too should
support each other over a similar bill for Gujarat,” Patel said.
.
Both
Dhanani and Patel said Gujarat should follow the example of the Maharashtra
bill, which was based on a survey of non-reserved classes conducted by a
backward class commission. Both the leaders also maintained that not just the
Patidars, but all non-reserved communities should be included in the same.
For
the first time in over two decades, the agitation left the BJP unsure about
unflinching support of influential Patidar community, which comprise 12% of the
six million population of Gujarat.
And
with demand of private member bill from the Congress, just before the 2019 Lok
Sabha election he has been trying to hit both the Congress and the BJP with one
stone.
“If
the Congress has love for us, it will support our demand. And, if the BJP will
not support the Congress’s bill, it will make their intention clear,” Patel
said.
After
leading agitations which were frowned upon because of their violent nature,
Hardik Patel’s latest argument based on the Maratha quotas in Maharashtra, is
being seen as legal and legitimate.
=========================================================
And today’s Hindustan Times
carries following headline :
“ 86 % Marathas
literate, how can they be educationally backward ?
16 % QUOTA / OBC
groups term findings in ATR , bill contradictory and unrealistic
Pleas against quota to be
heard on Monday “
==============================================
And , I am sure , none of the
persons / parties mentioned in these news , have read :
Divide
Quota ? To rule Raj ?
Imagine
the
·
great and unexpected troubles
·
A present which is a curse ,
When they
get to read that !
=========================================================
06
Dec 2018
www.hemenparekh.in / blogs
From: Hemen Parekh
[mailto:hcp@recruitguru.com]
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 4:35 PM
To: 'Cabinet Ministers'; 'assocham@nic.in'; 'ficci@ficci.com'; 'BJP National Executive'; 'psfs@mea.gov.in'; 'Rajeev.kher@ris.org.in'; 'Sanjeev@sanjeevsanyal.com'; 'ashah@ncaer.org'; 'Pulak.ghosh@iimb.ac.in'; 'ictsd@ictsd.ch'; 'amb-indiawto@nic.in'; 'rajiv@luthra.com'; 'cb@cii.in'; Loksabha1; Loksabha2; 'Rajyasabha'; 'Editors'; 'Economics'; 'supremecourt@nic.in' (supremecourt@nic.in); SupremeBarAssociation (SupremeBarAssociation@recruitguru.com)
Cc: 'ssbhalla@gmail.com'; 'bibek.debroy@gov.in'; 'ashima@igidr.ac.in'; 'rr1@nipfp.org.in'; 'ratanp.watal@gov.in'; 'ceo-niti@nic.in'; 'Indian Think Tanks'; 'Gurudatt Kundapurkar'; 'Haridas Shenoy'; 'Pradeep Talpade'; 'amit.doshi@dbcorp.in'; 'amitabh.kant@nic.in'; 'admin@narendramodi.in'; 'BJP-Dept-Heads'; 'Indrajit Sethi'; 'vch-niti@gov.in'; 'blchangemakers@thehindu.co.in'; hcp@RecruitGuru.com
Subject: A FREIGHTENING THOUGHT : PLEASE IGNORE FOR MANIFESTO
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 4:35 PM
To: 'Cabinet Ministers'; 'assocham@nic.in'; 'ficci@ficci.com'; 'BJP National Executive'; 'psfs@mea.gov.in'; 'Rajeev.kher@ris.org.in'; 'Sanjeev@sanjeevsanyal.com'; 'ashah@ncaer.org'; 'Pulak.ghosh@iimb.ac.in'; 'ictsd@ictsd.ch'; 'amb-indiawto@nic.in'; 'rajiv@luthra.com'; 'cb@cii.in'; Loksabha1; Loksabha2; 'Rajyasabha'; 'Editors'; 'Economics'; 'supremecourt@nic.in' (supremecourt@nic.in); SupremeBarAssociation (SupremeBarAssociation@recruitguru.com)
Cc: 'ssbhalla@gmail.com'; 'bibek.debroy@gov.in'; 'ashima@igidr.ac.in'; 'rr1@nipfp.org.in'; 'ratanp.watal@gov.in'; 'ceo-niti@nic.in'; 'Indian Think Tanks'; 'Gurudatt Kundapurkar'; 'Haridas Shenoy'; 'Pradeep Talpade'; 'amit.doshi@dbcorp.in'; 'amitabh.kant@nic.in'; 'admin@narendramodi.in'; 'BJP-Dept-Heads'; 'Indrajit Sethi'; 'vch-niti@gov.in'; 'blchangemakers@thehindu.co.in'; hcp@RecruitGuru.com
Subject: A FREIGHTENING THOUGHT : PLEASE IGNORE FOR MANIFESTO
Divide Quota ? To rule Raj ?
--------------------------------
Yesterday
, Maharashtra Assembly passed ( unanimously ) a bill providing a quota of 16 %
to the MARATHA community
Under
a new category called , “ Socially Backwards “
That
raised the total of quotas to 68 % ( including earlier 52 % okayed by the
Supreme Court )
Not
content with the “ Vote Gathering Impact “ of this “ Reform “ , Shri Fadnavis
said :
What
with 2019 elections looming large , it is only a matter of time before,
#
Gujarat tries to be one-up and grants 20 % quota to the PATIDARs
#
Haryana betters Gujarat by allotting 25 % quota to the JATs
If
the States can compete with each other for improving their respective ranks on
“ Ease of doing Business “ , then why not let them compete on “ Please of getting Votes “ ?
Of
course , that would mean that soon , we would have BACKWARD communities cornering
100 % quotas – leaving nothing for FORWARD communities !
To
overcome this “ Tyranny of Arithmetic “ , I
suggest following “ Skullduggery of Social
Statistics “
Let
us introduce a NEW
category with another 100
% quotas for “ FORWARD COMMUNITIES “
, under which to allot :
· 15
% to “ Socially Forward “
communities of Parsis and Punjabis
· 15
% to “ Economically Forward “
communities of Marwaris and Gujaratis
· 15
% to “ Educationally Forward
“ communities of Marathis and Keralites
· 15
% to “ Culturally Forward “
communities of Bengalis and Biharis
· 15
% to “ Religiously Forward “
communities of Ayodhyawasis and Babri-Niwasis
· 25
% to “ Politically Forward “
communities of Kashmiris and Naxalites
Now
, my above suggestion on % age distribution of quotas among “
FORWARD COMMUNITIES “ category , must not make those lose hearts who are
still uncovered !
Being
the world-class experts at “ SOCIALLY
DIVISIVE NOMENCLATURES “ , we have invented terminologies such as :
#
UMG [ Upper Middle Class ]
#
LMG [ Lower Middle Class ]
#
HNI [ High Net Worth Individuals , aka “ Stinking Rich “ ]
#
BPL [ Below Poverty Line ]
#
EWS [ Economically Weaker Sections ]
#
MIG [ Middle Income Group ]
#
LIG [ Low Income Group ]
#
Creamy Layer …………. Etc
Given
the political ingenuity of our Netas , I am certain that they will figure out
dozens of methods to circumvent the Supreme Court dictate and succeed in ( may
be ) granting 20 – 25 % reservation quota to any minority / majority group ,
bold enough to ask for it !
Why
can’t we have 1600 % quotas to satisfy everyone ?
After
all , it was we Indians who invented the concept of ZERO !
So , let us add as many ZEROs as we want
!
=========================================================
03
Dec 2018
www.hemenparekh.in / blogs
No comments:
Post a Comment