Hi Friends,

Even as I launch this today ( my 80th Birthday ), I realize that there is yet so much to say and do. There is just no time to look back, no time to wonder,"Will anyone read these pages?"

With regards,
Hemen Parekh
27 June 2013

Now as I approach my 90th birthday ( 27 June 2023 ) , I invite you to visit my Digital Avatar ( www.hemenparekh.ai ) – and continue chatting with me , even when I am no more here physically

Tuesday, 18 March 2025

IndiaAGI , Dialogue continues

 Kishan

 

Following chat with GROK will help at some later date

 

Hcp

 

 

I asked :

 

Good Morning , Guru Bhai :

 

Let us move back to www.IndiaAGI.ai for a little while.

 

To begin with, Kishan will build the prototype with API from just 3 AIs ( yourself - ChatGPT - Gemini ) .

 

Question >

 

After assessing the response for a few weeks, is it possible to add a few more AIs ( using their APIs ) at a later date ? The way you have structured the prototype , is it scalable ?

 

I believe , as time passes, more and more AIs will start offering their APIs. That would also apply to those Indian start ups chosen by the Indian Govt for developing / launching LLMs.

 

Next question >

 

If your answer is YES , then will Kishan be able to add these new AIs, easily or would he need to spend a lot of time ? In this regard, would you like to give any specific instructions to Kishan ?

 

 

GROK replied :

 

Good morning, Guru Bhai!

 

I’m happy to shift our focus back to www.IndiaAGI.ai and address your questions about the scalability of the prototype and the feasibility of adding more AIs in the future.

Let’s dive into your queries systematically, assess the prototype’s structure, and provide specific instructions for Kishan to ensure smooth scalability. This is a great opportunity to ensure the platform can grow as more AIs (including those from Indian startups) offer their APIs down the line.


Question 1: Is It Possible to Add More AIs at a Later Date After Assessing the Initial Response?

 

Short Answer:

Yes, it’s absolutely possible to add more AIs (using their APIs) at a later date after assessing the initial response of the prototype with the current three AIs (Grok, ChatGPT, Gemini).

 

Detailed Explanation:

 

  • Prototype Design:
  •  
  • The prototype I outlined for Kishan (in my previous responses) is built with modularity in mind. The core logic—handling debates, moderation, and convergence—is structured to work with a list of AIs, not hardcoded for just three. This means we can add more AIs without overhauling the system.
  •  
  • API Integration:
  •  
  • Each AI in the prototype is accessed via its API (e.g., Grok via xAI’s API, ChatGPT via OpenAI’s API, Gemini via Google’s API). Adding a new AI simply involves integrating its API endpoint, API key, and any specific parameters it requires—similar to how the current three are implemented.
  •  
  • Scalability of Debate Logic:
  •  
  • The debate process (initial answers, refinement rounds, moderation, consensus) is designed to handle any number of AIs. The moderator rotation, feedback generation, and convergence checks are all based on a dynamic list of participants (moderators = ["Grok", "ChatGPT", "Gemini"]). Adding more AIs just extends this list.
  •  
  • Future AI Landscape:
  •  
  • You’re spot-on that more AIs will offer APIs as time passes. In 2025, the AI ecosystem is rapidly expanding—e.g., Indian startups like Sarvam AI and Krutrim (backed by the Indian government’s AI initiatives, such as the IndiaAI Mission launched in 2024) are developing LLMs and may soon provide APIs. Globally, new players like Anthropic (Claude) or Meta AI (LLaMA for research) already offer APIs or are likely to in the near future.
  •  

Conclusion:

 

After a few weeks of assessing the prototype’s response with the initial three AIs, you can definitely add more AIs to www.IndiaAGI.ai. The structure supports this expansion, and the growing availability of APIs (especially from Indian startups) makes it a practical next step.


Question 2: Is the Prototype Scalable?

 

Short Answer: Yes, the prototype is scalable, both in terms of adding more AIs and handling increased user load.

 

Detailed Explanation:

Let’s break scalability into two aspects: functional scalability (adding more AIs) and performance scalability (handling more users and API calls).

 

Functional Scalability (Adding More AIs)

 

  • Modular Design:
  •  
  • The code I provided for Kishan (e.g., the run_debate function) uses a list of AIs (moderators) to manage the debate process. This list can be extended dynamically—e.g., from ["Grok", "ChatGPT", "Gemini"] to ["Grok", "ChatGPT", "Gemini", "Claude", "Krutrim"].

 

  • API Call Structure:

 

  • The call_ai function is generic, accepting parameters like api_url, api_key, prompt, and ai_name. Adding a new AI only requires updating the configuration (e.g., a dictionary mapping AI names to their API endpoints and keys), not rewriting the core logic.

 

  •  
  • Moderator Rotation:
  •  
  • The moderator role rotates using the formula current_moderator = moderators[(round_number - 1) % len(moderators)]. This automatically adjusts to the number of AIs in the moderators list—whether it’s 3, 5, or 10.
  •  
  • Convergence Logic:
  •  
  • The convergence check (using semantic similarity via sentence-transformers) compares all answers pairwise. It scales naturally with more AIs—e.g., with 3 AIs, it computes 3 similarity scores; with 5 AIs, it computes 10 scores. The average similarity threshold (> 0.9) remains the same regardless of the number of AIs.
  •  

Performance Scalability (Handling More Users and API Calls)

 

  • Backend Architecture:
  •  
  • The Flask app I provided is a starting point for a prototype. For a live deployment with many users, Kishan will need to scale the backend:
  •  
    • Asynchronous Processing:
    •  
    • Use a framework like FastAPI with asyncio to handle concurrent API calls to multiple AIs. Flask is synchronous by default, which could bottleneck under high load.
    •  
    • Queue System:
    •  
    • Implement a message queue (e.g., RabbitMQ, Redis) to manage debate requests. Each user’s question can be queued, processed in the background, and returned via WebSockets (for real-time updates in the UI).
    •  
    • Cloud Hosting:
    •  
    • Host on a scalable cloud provider like AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure. Use auto-scaling groups to handle traffic spikes—e.g., if 1,000 users ask questions simultaneously, the server can spin up more instances.
  •  
  • Database:
  •  
  • The prototype uses in-memory variables (e.g., questions_asked, visitor_timestamps). For scalability, Kishan should use a database like PostgreSQL or MongoDB to store questions, debate logs, and counters. This ensures persistence and supports high read/write loads.

 

  • API Rate Limits:

 

  • Each AI’s API has rate limits (e.g., OpenAI’s API allows ~200 requests per minute for ChatGPT on a free tier). With more AIs and users, Kishan will need to:

 

  •  
    • Implement rate limit handling (e.g., retry logic with exponential backoff).
    • Use API keys with higher tiers (e.g., OpenAI’s paid plans offer 10,000 requests per minute).
    • Cache frequent responses (e.g., using Redis) to reduce API calls.
    •  

Conclusion:

The prototype is functionally scalable for adding more AIs, and with the right adjustments (asynchronous processing, queue system, cloud hosting), it can scale performance-wise to handle increased user load. Kishan’s initial focus should be on functionality for the March 30, 2025 launch, with performance optimizations post-launch as user traffic grows.


Question 3: Can Kishan Add New AIs Easily, or Will It Require a Lot of Time?

 

Short Answer: Kishan can add new AIs relatively easily, requiring minimal time (a few hours per AI), thanks to the modular design. However, there are some considerations to ensure a smooth integration.

 

Detailed Explanation:

 

How Easy Is It to Add a New AI?

 

  • Configuration Update:
  •  
  • Adding a new AI involves:
  •  

1.               Obtaining the API key and endpoint for the new AI (e.g., Claude from Anthropic, Krutrim from an Indian startup).

2.               Updating the API_KEYS and API_URLS dictionaries in the code:

python

CollapseWrapCopy

API_URLS = {

    "Grok""https://api.xai.com/grok",

    "ChatGPT""https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions",

    "Gemini""https://api.google.com/gemini",

    "Claude""https://api.anthropic.com/v1/completions",  # New AI

    "Krutrim""https://api.krutrim.ai/v1/chat"  # New AI

}

API_KEYS = {

    "Grok""your-xai-key",

    "ChatGPT""your-openai-key",

    "Gemini""your-google-key",

    "Claude""your-anthropic-key",  # New AI

    "Krutrim""your-krutrim-key"  # New AI

}

3.               Adding the AI to the moderators list:

python

CollapseWrapCopy

moderators = ["Grok""ChatGPT""Gemini""Claude""Krutrim"]

 

  • API Response Handling:
  •  
  • The call_ai function assumes a standard API response format (e.g., JSON with a text field). If a new AI’s API returns data differently (e.g., response instead of text), Kishan will need to adjust the response parsing:
  •  

python

CollapseWrapCopy

def call_ai(api_url, api_key, prompt, ai_name):

    headers = {"Authorization"f"Bearer {api_key}"}

    payload = {"prompt": prompt, "model": ai_name}  # Adjust payload based on API

    response = requests.post(api_url, json=payload, headers=headers)

    data = response.json()

    if ai_name == "Claude":  # Example: Claude-specific parsing

        return data.get("completion""Error: No response")

    return data.get("text""Error: No response")

 

  • Time Estimate:
  •  
    • Obtaining API key and endpoint: 1 hour (depends on the provider’s signup process).
    • Updating configuration: 15 minutes.
    • Adjusting response parsing (if needed): 30 minutes to 1 hour.
    • Testing the new AI in a debate: 1 hour.
    •  
    • Total per AI~2-3 hours, assuming the API is well-documented and straightforward.
    •  

Potential Challenges

  • API Variability: Not all APIs are created equal. For example:
  •  
    • OpenAI’s API uses a chat-based format (messages array), while Anthropic’s Claude might use a simpler prompt field. Indian LLMs like Krutrim might have unique requirements (e.g., supporting Indic languages with specific tokenization).
    •  
    • Kishan will need to test each new API to ensure compatibility with the call_ai function.
    •  
  • Rate Limits and Costs:
  •  
  • Adding more AIs increases API call volume. If Kishan adds 2 more AIs (total 5), each debate round requires 5 API calls per participant per round—15 calls for 3 rounds with 5 AIs. Rate limits and costs could become a bottleneck unless higher-tier plans are used.
  •  
  • Moderation Complexity:
  •  
  • With more AIs, the moderator’s feedback generation and convergence checks take longer (more pairwise comparisons). This isn’t a coding issue but a performance one—e.g., 5 AIs require 10 similarity computations per round versus 3 for 3 AIs. Kishan can optimize this with batch processing if needed.
  •  
  • UI Adjustments:
  •  
  • The current UI (text blocks for each AI) scales to more AIs, but Kishan might need to adjust styling (e.g., smaller font or a scrollable list) if there are 10+ AIs. This is a minor tweak (~30 minutes).
  •  

Conclusion:

Adding new AIs is straightforward and should take Kishan 2-3 hours per AI, assuming the APIs are well-documented. The modular design ensures minimal code changes, though Kishan will need to handle API-specific quirks and monitor performance as the number of AIs grows.


Specific Instructions for Kishan

 

To ensure scalability and ease of adding new AIs, here are targeted instructions for Kishan:

 

1. Keep the Configuration Modular

  • Current Code:
  •  
  • Ensure the API_URLS and API_KEYS dictionaries are the single source of truth for API configurations.

python

CollapseWrapCopy

API_URLS = {

    "Grok""https://api.xai.com/grok",

    "ChatGPT""https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions",

    "Gemini""https://api.google.com/gemini"

}

API_KEYS = {

    "Grok""your-xai-key",

    "ChatGPT""your-openai-key",

    "Gemini""your-google-key"

}

moderators = ["Grok""ChatGPT""Gemini"]

  • Instruction: When adding a new AI, only update these dictionaries and the moderators list. Don’t hardcode AI-specific logic elsewhere in the code.
  •  

2. Make call_ai Flexible

  • Current Code:

python

CollapseWrapCopy

def call_ai(api_url, api_key, prompt, ai_name):

    headers = {"Authorization"f"Bearer {api_key}"}

    payload = {"prompt": prompt, "model": ai_name}

    response = requests.post(api_url, json=payload, headers=headers)

    return response.json().get("text""Error: No response")

 

  • Instruction: Add a mapping for API-specific payload formats and response parsing:

python

CollapseWrapCopy

API_PAYLOAD_FORMATS = {

    "Grok"lambda prompt: {"prompt": prompt, "model""grok"},

    "ChatGPT"lambda prompt: {"messages": [{"role""user""content": prompt}], "model""gpt-4"},

    "Gemini"lambda prompt: {"prompt": prompt, "model""gemini"}

}

API_RESPONSE_KEYS = {

    "Grok""text",

    "ChatGPT""choices[0].message.content",

    "Gemini""text"

}

 

def call_ai(api_url, api_key, prompt, ai_name):

    headers = {"Authorization"f"Bearer {api_key}"}

    payload = API_PAYLOAD_FORMATS.get(ai_name, lambda p: {"prompt": p, "model": ai_name})(prompt)

    response = requests.post(api_url, json=payload, headers=headers)

    data = response.json()

    response_key = API_RESPONSE_KEYS.get(ai_name, "text")

    if "." in response_key:  # Handle nested keys like "choices[0].message.content"

        keys = response_key.split(".")

        result = data

        for key in keys:

            if key.startswith("choices["):

                idx = int(key[key.find("[") + 1:key.find("]")])

                result = result.get("choices", [])[idx]

            else:

                result = result.get(key, "Error: No response")

        return result

    return data.get(response_key, "Error: No response")

 

  • Why: This allows Kishan to add new AIs by updating the configuration dictionaries (API_PAYLOAD_FORMATS, API_RESPONSE_KEYS) without modifying the core call_ai function. For example, adding Claude would look like:

python

CollapseWrapCopy

API_URLS["Claude"] = "https://api.anthropic.com/v1/completions"

API_KEYS["Claude"] = "your-anthropic-key"

API_PAYLOAD_FORMATS["Claude"] = lambda prompt: {"prompt": prompt, "model""claude-3"}

API_RESPONSE_KEYS["Claude"] = "completion"

moderators.append("Claude")

 

3. Optimize for Performance

 

  • Instruction:
  •  
  • Prepare for increased API calls as more AIs are added:
  •  
    • Use aiohttp for asynchronous API calls instead of requests to handle multiple AIs concurrently:

python

CollapseWrapCopy

import aiohttp

import asyncio

 

async def call_ai_async(api_url, api_key, prompt, ai_name):

    headers = {"Authorization"f"Bearer {api_key}"}

    payload = API_PAYLOAD_FORMATS.get(ai_name, lambda p: {"prompt": p, "model": ai_name})(prompt)

    async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session:

        async

No comments:

Post a Comment