Dear Mr Chyba ,
At the age of 91+, I won’t be around to see practical solutions to the implementation of either my suggestion or of your suggestions but then , if people stop dreaming big , then this earth stands no chance
Regards,
Hemen Parekh
Mumbai – India / www.HemenParekh.ai
Harnessing Earth’s Magnetic Field for Power
Context :
Scientists Turned the Earth’s Rotation Into 17 Microvolts of Electricity. That Could Be Revolutionary.
{ Popular Mechanics / 21 March 2025 }
Extract :
As climate change continues to impact countries and communities around the world, humanity is hungry for alternative sources of green energy. Luckily, the natural world provides them in abundance. Turbines harvest wind energy, solar panels collect the Sun’s light, generators capture the power in a wave’s motion, and even geothermal heat transforms into usable electrons. Now, some scientists are considering a completely new renewable energy source: the Earth’s rotation.
Ok, maybe not completely new. Back in 2016, Christopher Chyba from Princeton published a paper exploring the possibility of generating electricity by rotating through the Earth’s magnetic field. This drew some criticism, as most experts figured that any net voltage would be cancelled by the rearrangement of electrons during said generation process, according to Phys.org.
To prove that the idea had merit, Chyba decided to construct a foot-long device made from manganese-zinc ferrite and conduct experiments in a dark, windowless laboratory. While the laboratory remained stationary, the rotation of the Earth carried the cylinder through the magnetic field. True to Chyba’s original predictions, the device produced 17 microvolts of electricity when held perpendicular to the magnetic field. The results of the study were published in the journal Physical Review Research.
“The device appeared to violate the conclusion that any conductor at rest with respect to Earth’s surface cannot generate power from its magnetic field,” Chyba said in a press statement.
As Nature notes, 17 microvolts is a fantastically minuscule amount—a fraction of what a single neuron produces when firing. Because of this incredibly small voltage, some experts remain skeptical of the idea’s practicality, saying that many sources can cause small voltage discrepancies. Chyba, for his part, did conduct the experiment with a solid chunk of conductor (and found zero voltage). He also re-ran the experiment in a non-laboratory setting—a residential building a few miles from the lab—and came up with the same results.
“This was a largely unregulated environment, in contrast to that of our primary laboratory,” the researchers reported. “The resulting data are noisy with correspondingly large error bars in comparison with the results obtained in our primary laboratory. Nevertheless, the data once again show the voltage magnitude and behavior under rotation predicted by our effect, demonstrating that the observed effect is not due to an unidentified local influence in our primary laboratory.”
So how does this manganese-zinc ferrite cylinder work? Well, put simply, certain complex configurations of materials can channel Earth’s magnetic field in such a way that they push past the ability of the electrostatic force to cancel out generated electricity. Of course, microvolts aren’t exactly utility scale power, but Chyba—while sharing those scalability concerns—remains optimistic. Before we start leveraging the Earth’s rotation as a source of energy, however, another lab will need to reproduce these results.
“Both papers talk about how it might be scaled up, but none of that has been demonstrated, and it might well prove not to be possible,” Chyba said in a press statement. “And in any case, the first thing that needs to happen is that some independent group needs to reproduce—or rebut—our results, with a system closely similar to our own.”
My Take :
Congratulations , Christopher Chyba :
{ cchyba@princeton.edu }
I am very happy that we thought alike on this topic . Here is my blog of 2014 :
Extract :
The biggest cause for the degradation of environment is burning of fossil fuels
Burning of coal / gas / oil etc produces green-house gases , leading to global warming / floods / droughts etc
Everyone knows that the real long term solution is switching over to renewable energy sources such as wind / sun / tides etc
Can we tap earth's magnetism to produce abundant / unlimited / clean energy ?
I believe so and would request the scientists to consider my following suggestion :
Every school child knows that ,
> Electricity is generated when a copper wire is rotated in any magnetic field
> Earth is surrounded by a very strong magnetic field
> This magnetic field is generated by the rotation of molten iron deep inside earth's core
> This magnetic field also protects us from harmful ultra-violet rays / gamma radiations from space
Now , suppose we find a way to ,
> Construct a hollow cylinder of woven Copper wires to envelope the earth , 100 miles above the earth's surface ( like those thin rings of Saturn )
> Then , using small rocket thrusts , rotate this cylinder in the direction opposite of earth's
rotation , to cut through its magnetic field
Will that generate electricity ?
I think so
With international co-operation such a project would take less time - and possibly money too - than the already successful international projects of the International Space Station or the Large Hadron Collider of CERN
It may be exciting to discover the God Particle and understand what makes up mass but I think , it is far more useful to find a permanent / clean source of energy to prevent the extinction of all life on earth by burning fossil fuels
With Regards,
Hemen Parekh
www.My-Teacher.in / www.HemenParekh.ai
Here is how GROK opined about this :
Tabulation: Comparing Hemen Parekh’s 2014 Blog and Christopher Chyba’s 2016/2025 Research
Aspect | Hemen Parekh’s 2014 Blog: Salvaging Life On Earth | Christopher Chyba’s 2016/2025 Research: Electric Power from Earth’s Rotation |
Core Concept | Proposes constructing a massive hollow cylinder of woven copper wires, 100 miles above Earth’s surface, to envelope the planet like Saturn’s rings. The cylinder would rotate in the opposite direction of Earth’s rotation using rocket thrusts, cutting through Earth’s magnetic field to generate electricity via electromagnetic induction. | Demonstrates that a stationary device on Earth’s surface can generate electricity by interacting with the planet’s magnetic field as it rotates. Uses a foot-long hollow cylinder made of manganese-zinc ferrite to channel the magnetic field in a way that prevents the electrostatic force from canceling the generated current, tapping into Earth’s rotational energy. |
Mechanism | Relies on electromagnetic induction: a conductor (copper wire cylinder) moves through a magnetic field (Earth’s) to induce a current. The cylinder’s counter-rotation increases the relative motion between the conductor and the magnetic field, theoretically generating electricity. | Exploits a loophole in classical electromagnetism: a specially designed cylinder with low magnetic Reynolds number and specific topology (hollow, made of manganese-zinc ferrite) creates a magnetic field configuration where the magnetic force on electrons isn’t fully canceled by the electric force, generating a small current (17 microvolts) as the device moves with Earth’s rotation. |
Scale of Device | Envisions a planetary-scale structure: a hollow cylinder of woven copper wires encircling Earth at 100 miles altitude, requiring international cooperation on the scale of projects like the International Space Station or CERN’s Large Hadron Collider. | Uses a small, laboratory-scale device: a foot-long hollow cylinder made of manganese-zinc ferrite, tested in controlled environments (a dark, windowless lab and a residential building). The setup is designed to be stationary on Earth’s surface, leveraging the planet’s rotation. |
Energy Source | Taps into Earth’s magnetic field, with the energy for electricity generation coming from the rocket thrusts that rotate the cylinder against Earth’s rotation. The proposal doesn’t explicitly address where the energy for sustained rocket thrusts would come from. | Extracts energy directly from Earth’s rotational kinetic energy via its magnetic field. The process theoretically slows Earth’s rotation (e.g., by 7 milliseconds over a century if scaled to meet global energy needs of 11 trillion watts), but this impact is minimal and comparable to natural phenomena like the Moon’s tidal effects. |
Output Achieved | No experimental results; the idea is purely theoretical and speculative, with no prototype or data to support the concept. The blog poses the question, “Will that generate electricity?” and answers, “I think so,” without calculations or evidence. | Experimentally verified: the device generated 17 microvolts of electricity in controlled tests, with voltage varying predictably based on the cylinder’s orientation relative to Earth’s magnetic field and rotation. A solid cylinder (not hollow) produced zero voltage, supporting the theory. |
Feasibility | Highly impractical due to the scale and complexity of the setup:<br>- Constructing a cylinder to envelope Earth at 100 miles altitude is beyond current engineering capabilities.<br>- Continuous rocket thrusts to rotate the cylinder would require immense energy, likely exceeding the energy generated, making it inefficient.<br>- Space-based infrastructure faces challenges like orbital stability, space debris risks, and astronomical costs (potentially trillions of dollars). | More feasible on a small scale, but scaling up is uncertain:<br>- The lab setup is simple and uses Earth’s natural rotation, requiring no external energy input to move the device.<br>- However, the output (17 microvolts) is minuscule—far below practical utility-scale power (e.g., a AA battery produces 1.5 volts).<br>- Scaling up would require larger devices or materials with better properties, but experts are skeptical due to the tiny voltage and potential interference from other effects (e.g., temperature variations). |
Environmental Impact | Aims to provide a clean, renewable energy source to replace fossil fuels, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change. However, the energy required for rocket thrusts could offset these benefits if sourced from non-renewable fuels, and the environmental impact of launching such a massive structure into space (e.g., emissions from rockets) isn’t addressed. | Offers a potentially emission-free energy source, as it generates electricity without fuel or moving parts. If scaled up, it could contribute to carbon-free energy production. However, the impact is negligible at the current scale (nanowatts), and scaling up might require energy-intensive manufacturing processes for larger devices. |
Scientific Rigor | Lacks scientific rigor: the proposal is a conceptual idea without mathematical modeling, experimental data, or consideration of physical constraints (e.g., energy balance, magnetic field strength, or orbital mechanics). It oversimplifies the problem by assuming a large-scale conductor in space can efficiently generate power. | Grounded in rigorous scientific theory and experimentation: Chyba’s 2016 paper identified a theoretical loophole in classical electromagnetism, and the 2025 experiments validated the concept with measurable results (17 microvolts). The research accounts for factors like magnetic Reynolds number, field configuration, and orientation, though it faces skepticism due to the small output and potential for spurious signals. |
Challenges Highlighted | - Engineering a planetary-scale structure in space.<br>- Sustaining counter-rotation with rocket thrusts, which would require continuous energy input.<br>- International cooperation and funding on an unprecedented scale.<br>- No discussion of how to transmit the generated electricity back to Earth or the efficiency of the process. | - Extremely low power output (17 microvolts), making it impractical for real-world applications without significant scaling.<br>- Skepticism from experts about the validity of the results, with concerns about spurious signals (e.g., from temperature variations or hidden currents).<br>- Need for independent replication to confirm the findings.<br>- Uncertainty about scalability due to material limitations and the weak strength of Earth’s magnetic field. |
Potential Impact | If feasible, it could provide a theoretically unlimited clean energy source, potentially revolutionizing energy production and halting climate change by replacing fossil fuels. However, the idea’s impracticality makes this impact speculative and unlikely in the foreseeable future. | If scalable, it could offer a novel source of emission-free energy, useful in niche applications (e.g., remote locations, space missions, or low-power devices). However, the current output is too small to make a meaningful dent in global energy needs, and experts doubt its practical utility even if scaled up. |
Critical Assessment | The idea is visionary but lacks grounding in practical physics or engineering. It overlooks key challenges like the energy cost of rocket thrusts, the weak strength of Earth’s magnetic field (about 45 microtesla at the surface), and the difficulty of transmitting power from space to Earth. The proposal feels more like a thought experiment than a viable solution, ignoring the energy balance that would likely make the system a net energy consumer rather than a producer. | The research is scientifically sound and experimentally validated, but its practical impact is limited by the tiny output. While it challenges conventional electromagnetic theory with a clever loophole, the skepticism from experts (e.g., Rinke Wijngaarden’s failed replication in 2018) and the need for independent verification highlight uncertainties. The idea is more promising for theoretical physics than for addressing the climate crisis in the near term, as scaling up to utility-scale power seems improbable with current technology. |
Critical Analysis
Hemen Parekh’s 2014 Blog: Your idea, bhaiyya, is bold and imaginative, reflecting a deep concern for the climate crisis and a desire to find a permanent, clean energy solution. The concept of using Earth’s magnetic field via a massive space-based cylinder taps into the basic principle of electromagnetic induction, which is well-established (e.g., as used in traditional generators). However, the proposal faces significant hurdles:
- Energy Balance: The energy required to launch and sustain the cylinder’s counter-rotation with rocket thrusts would likely far exceed the electricity generated. Earth’s magnetic field is weak (25–65 microtesla), and the induced voltage in a conductor moving through it (even at high speeds) would be small, as the voltage depends on the field strength, the conductor’s length, and the relative velocity (Faraday’s law: emf=−dΦBdt \text{emf} = - \frac{d\Phi_B}{dt} emf=−dtdΦB, where ΦB=B⋅A \Phi_B = B \cdot A ΦB=B⋅A).
- Engineering Feasibility: Building a structure to encircle Earth at 100 miles altitude (low Earth orbit) is beyond current capabilities. The International Space Station, a much smaller project, cost $150 billion and took a decade to build. Your cylinder would require millions of tons of copper, posing logistical and financial challenges (potentially costing trillions).
- Power Transmission: The blog doesn’t address how the generated electricity would be transmitted back to Earth. Wireless power transmission over such distances is inefficient, and physical cables from orbit to the surface are impractical due to atmospheric drag and structural stresses.
- Environmental Impact: Launching such a massive structure would produce significant emissions (e.g., rocket launches emit 200–300 tons of CO₂ per launch), potentially offsetting the environmental benefits of the clean energy generated.
While the idea is inspiring, it’s more of a conceptual vision than a practical solution. It would require breakthroughs in materials science, space engineering, and energy transmission to become viable.
Christopher Chyba’s Research: Chyba’s work is a fascinating exploration of a theoretical loophole in classical electromagnetism, backed by experimental evidence. The use of a manganese-zinc ferrite cylinder to generate 17 microvolts by tapping into Earth’s rotational energy is a novel concept, and the fact that it produced measurable results is noteworthy. However, there are significant limitations:
- Output Scale: 17 microvolts is an extremely small voltage—orders of magnitude below what’s needed for practical applications. For context, a typical household appliance requires 120 volts (in the US) or 230 volts (in India). Even if scaled up, the weak strength of Earth’s magnetic field limits the potential output, as the induced voltage is proportional to the field strength and the rate of change of magnetic flux.
- Skepticism and Reproducibility: Experts like Rinke Wijngaarden, who failed to replicate the effect in 2018, and Yong Zhu, who cites potential spurious signals, highlight the need for independent verification. The small voltage could be due to external factors (e.g., thermoelectric effects, as Chyba controlled for by conducting experiments in the dark).
- Scalability: Chyba acknowledges that scaling up to produce meaningful power is uncertain. The device’s output is in the nanowatt range, while global energy demand is in the terawatt range (11 trillion watts in 2022). Even if scaled, the energy extracted would come from Earth’s rotational energy, slowing the planet’s spin by a negligible amount (7 milliseconds per century at global scale), but the infrastructure required for large-scale deployment could be energy-intensive to build.
- Practical Applications: The technology might find niche uses (e.g., powering low-energy devices in remote locations or space missions), but it’s unlikely to contribute significantly to the climate crisis in the near term. Solar panels or wind turbines, which produce kilowatts to megawatts, are far more practical for large-scale renewable energy.
Chyba’s research is a scientific breakthrough in demonstrating a new principle, but its impact on the climate crisis is limited by its current scale and the challenges of scaling up.
Comparison and Climate Relevance: Both proposals aim to harness Earth’s magnetic field for clean energy, addressing the climate crisis by reducing reliance on fossil fuels. Your 2014 blog envisions a grand, space-based solution that could theoretically provide unlimited energy, but its impracticality makes it more of a thought experiment. Chyba’s research, while grounded in experimental results, produces such a tiny output that its immediate impact on climate change is negligible. Neither approach currently offers a viable alternative to established renewables like solar, wind, or hydro, which are already deployed at scale (e.g., India’s solar capacity reached 85 GW by 2024, per the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy).
For the climate crisis, the urgency requires solutions that can be implemented quickly and at scale. Technologies like solar and wind are proven, cost-effective (solar costs dropped to $0.03/kWh in India by 2024), and can reduce emissions now. While both your idea and Chyba’s research are innovative, they are more speculative and long-term, unlikely to address the immediate needs of the climate catastrophe (e.g., reducing emissions by 45% by 2030 to stay below 1.5°C warming, per IPCC).
Final Thoughts
Bhaiyya, your 2014 blog and Chyba’s research share a common goal—using Earth’s magnetic field to generate clean energy—but they differ vastly in their approach and feasibility. Your idea is a visionary, large-scale concept that captures the imagination but faces insurmountable practical challenges. Chyba’s work is a scientifically rigorous proof-of-concept with experimental validation, but its tiny output limits its real-world impact for now. Both ideas highlight the need for innovative thinking in the fight against climate change, but they also underscore the gap between theoretical possibilities and practical solutions.
