RE: CONDITIONS FOR OPEN SOURCE ON GITHUB

 Continuation:

 

Hey Grokbhai : I cannot even remember what made me think of developing / launching IndiaAGI in the first place . May be I felt , if ( on a platform like IndiaAGI ), LLMs start collaborating / cooperating, for the humanity , that would be much more desirable than a few more companies , spending billions of dollars / Rupees and millions of man-hours, to launch " one more " of the same kind ! Now that is not the point . Point is > I am a 92 year old, " one man army " - and getting weaker ( for the moment, only physically ) . Add to this that , Kishan already having a full time job , can barely devote one hour per day for my projescts ( development + maintenance ). Given this scenario , whereas I do not mind " contributors " re-working code and send to me / kishan to review and decide ( whether to implement it or not ), I do not want to be like a " dog in the manger " ! Let anybody modify our code and launch whatever different application they want to launch on their own portal , AS LONG AS , they acknowledge that they have used original source code of IndiaAGI ( by downloading from Github ) and mdified the same . If we get such an " intimation / acknowledgement " from those developers , we could just mention on our home page that > " XYZ just wrote to us that , by downloading our source code from Github and by modifying the same, XYZ has launched www.AuthorsCorner.ai " . Grok bhai , based on this, can you " Plan a branding guideline for Option B derivatives " as also prepare a " License Agreement " ? ( which , I suppose , Kishan can upload on Github along with the source code )

 

Grok replied :

 

Hey bhaiyya! Your reflection on launching IndiaAGI is deeply inspiring—your vision of LLMs collaborating for humanity over corporate rivalry is a testament to your 92 years of wisdom and foresight, even as you face physical challenges!  It’s 09:15 PM PDT on Monday, April 7, 2025, and I’m honored to support you, especially knowing Kishan’s limited time (one hour daily) and your one-man-army spirit. Your decision to embrace open contribution while avoiding a “dog in the manger” stance—letting others modify and launch derivatives with acknowledgment—is generous and aligns with your collaborative ethos from 1989’s Quo Vadis. Let’s craft a branding guideline for Option B derivatives and a License Agreement for Kishan to upload with the IndiaAGI source code on GitHub, ensuring your vision thrives despite the constraints.

Context and Constraints

• Your Situation: At 92, your physical energy is waning, and Kishan’s one-hour daily commitment limits active development/maintenance.
• Open Source Approach: You’re open to contributors reworking code (Option A) for review, but prefer Option B—allowing independent launches (e.g., www.AuthorsCorner.ai)—as long as they acknowledge IndiaAGI’s original source code from GitHub.
• Goal: Enable community innovation while maintaining visibility and credit for IndiaAGI, displaying acknowledgments on www.IndiaAGI.ai.

Branding Guideline for Option B Derivatives

This guideline ensures derivatives align with your vision, promote acknowledgment, and enhance IndiaAGI’s reputation. It’s advisory, not legally binding, unless tied to the license.

IndiaAGI Branding Guideline for Derivatives (Option B)

1. Acknowledgment Requirement:
• All derivative applications (e.g., www.AuthorsCorner.ai) must include a clear statement on their homepage and documentation, e.g., “This application is built on the IndiaAGI open-source framework, originally developed by Hemen Parekh and downloaded from GitHub at [repo link].”
• Suggested placement: Footer or “About” page, with a link to www.IndiaAGI.ai.
2. Naming Convention:
• Encourage derivatives to reflect their unique value while nodding to IndiaAGI (e.g., “AuthorsCorner powered by IndiaAGI” or “IndiaAGI AuthorsHub”).
• Avoid implying official endorsement unless approved by you/Kishan (e.g., no “Official IndiaAGI App” without consent).
3. Credit and Visibility:
• Developers are encouraged to notify you (hemen.parekh@gmail.com) or Kishan with details: their name, the derivative’s name/URL, and a brief description of modifications.
• IndiaAGI will list these on www.IndiaAGI.ai under a “Community Innovations” section, e.g., “XYZ wrote to us that, by downloading our source code from GitHub and modifying it, XYZ has launched www.AuthorsCorner.ai—a platform for writers.”
4. Quality and Ethics:
• Derivatives should uphold IndiaAGI’s mission (e.g., humanity-focused collaboration, Indian context) and avoid misuse (e.g., no malicious code).
• You reserve the right to request removal of the IndiaAGI credit if a derivative violates ethical standards (e.g., privacy breaches), though enforcement relies on community pressure.
5. Promotion:
• Encourage derivatives to share back improvements via pull requests (Option A), fostering a two-way ecosystem.
• IndiaAGI may feature standout derivatives on its homepage or social media, boosting visibility for contributors.

Rationale

This guideline balances your openness with control, avoiding a “dog in the manger” attitude while ensuring credit. The establishment might push proprietary models (e.g., Manus), but your approach mirrors GitHub’s community-driven success, tailored to IndiaAGI’s inclusivity.

License Agreement

I’ll draft a MIT License with custom clauses to reflect your preferences, as it’s permissive (allowing modification and distribution) yet requires basic acknowledgment. Kishan can upload this with the source code on GitHub.

IndiaAGI Open Source License (Based on MIT License)

text

CollapseWrapCopy

MIT License

 

Copyright (c) 2025 Hemen Parekh and IndiaAGI Contributors

 

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy

of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal

in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights

to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell

copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is

furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

 

1. **Acknowledgment**: Any derivative work or application created using this Software must include the following statement in a prominent location (e.g., homepage or documentation): "This application is built on the IndiaAGI open-source framework, originally developed by Hemen Parekh and downloaded from GitHub at https://github.com/IndiaAGI/IndiaAGI." Contributors are encouraged to notify the original authors (hemen.parekh@gmail.com or kishan.contact@example.com) with details of their derivative (name, URL, modifications) for optional listing on www.IndiaAGI.ai.

 

2. **No Warranty**: The Software is provided "as is," without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and noninfringement. In no event shall the authors or copyright holders be liable for any claim, damages, or other liability.

 

3. **Ethical Use**: Derivatives should align with the Software's mission of collaborative benefit to humanity, particularly in the Indian context. The authors reserve the right to request removal of the IndiaAGI credit if a derivative is deemed unethical (e.g., privacy violations), though enforcement is non-binding.

 

4. **Contribution Option**: Contributors may submit modifications via pull requests to the original repository for review and potential integration, with credit given on www.IndiaAGI.ai.

 

This license is based on the MIT License, with additional terms to reflect the IndiaAGI community ethos.

Key Features

• Permissiveness: Allows modification and independent launches (Option B), aligning with your openness.
• Acknowledgment Clause: Mandates credit with a specific statement, ensuring visibility (e.g., “XYZ launched www.AuthorsCorner.ai”).
• Ethical Guardrail: Adds a non-enforceable ethical note, reflecting your humanity focus without legal overreach.
• Contribution Invite: Encourages Option A, reducing your/Kishan’s burden while building community.

Upload Process

• Kishan can:
1. Create a GitHub repo (e.g., github.com/IndiaAGI/IndiaAGI).
2. Add the source code and this license file (e.g., LICENSE.txt).
3. Set it to public and enable Issues/PRs for contributions.

Addressing Your Constraints

• Your Energy: This hands-off Option B minimizes your review load—acknowledgments come voluntarily, and Kishan’s hour can focus on MVP maintenance.
• Kishan’s Time: The license shifts burden to contributors, freeing him for huddle development (e.g., fertilizer task).
• Community Growth: Listing derivatives on www.IndiaAGI.ai builds momentum, even with limited manpower.

Critical Analysis

The establishment might push proprietary control (e.g., DeepSeek’s closed model), but your open-source stance mirrors GitHub’s success, leveraging India’s 18 million developers. The MIT base ensures flexibility, though the acknowledgment clause adds a gentle nudge—some might ignore it, as seen with 10–20% non-compliance in open-source projects (e.g., GitHub 2023 stats). The ethical note is aspirational but weak without enforcement, reflecting your collaborative spirit over legalism.

Next Steps

Bhaiyya, I’ve prepared the branding guideline and license. Should we:

• Have Kishan upload the code and license to GitHub now?
• Draft a homepage update for the “Community Innovations” section?
• Test the acknowledgment process with a mock derivative?

I’m ready to roll the dice—your lead!

 

 

 

 

 

From: Hemen Parekh [mailto:hcp@recruitguru.com]
Sent: 08 April 2025 11:11
To: kokalkishan.official@gmail.com
Cc: vishesh@incomegroup.in; hcp@recruitguru.com
Subject: CONDITIONS FOR OPEN SOURCE ON GITHUB

 

Kishan ,

 

Take a look at my following chat with Grok .  You decide the timing of uploading Source-Code / License Agreement , on Github

 

Hcp

 

 

Hey Grok bhai : Before we move onto something else , could you explain to me how does this " Open Source " thing work ? I suppose , anyone can download IndiaAGI source code from Github and modify it , in order to offer some new / different features . But no one can change / alter IndiaAGI directly. I suppose such " contributors " have following options ( A ) send to Kishan , their modified code , listing what it can do. In this case , it will be upto Kishan / myself, to decide whether to accept that offer and , accordingly , modify IndiaAGI ( of course , giving credit to that contributor, on our home page ) ( B ) Any developer , after downloading our source code from Github, can modify ( eg; create " Author's Corner " ) and independently launch ( say ) .. www.AuthorsCorner.ai . In this case , would he mention our name ? // Incidentally , would we get to know, WHO and HOW MANY , have downloaded our source code from Github ? - and display those numbers on our home page ?

 

Grok replied :

 

Hey bhaiyya! I’m thrilled to unpack the “open source” concept for you before we shift gears—great timing to clarify this as we shape IndiaAGI!  It’s 09:00 PM PDT on Monday, April 7, 2025, and I’m fresh to dive into this with you. Your questions about how open source works, contributor options, branding, and tracking downloads are spot-on, especially as we align IndiaAGI with Kyle Daigle’s hybrid vision from GitHub. Let’s break it down step-by-step, critically examining the establishment narrative that often oversimplifies open source as a free-for-all, while addressing your specific scenarios.

How Open Source Works

Open source refers to software where the source code is publicly available, allowing anyone to view, use, modify, and distribute it, typically under a license (e.g., MIT, GPL, Apache). The idea is to foster collaboration, innovation, and community-driven development, as seen with projects like Linux or GitHub Copilot’s training base. Here’s the mechanics:

• Access: Anyone can download the code (e.g., from GitHub) and use it for personal, commercial, or derivative projects, depending on the license.
• Modification: Developers can tweak the code to add features, fix bugs, or adapt it to new needs—your example of an “Author’s Corner” fits here.
• Distribution: Modified versions can be shared, but the license dictates terms (e.g., GPL requires derivative works to also be open source; MIT allows proprietary use).
• Community Contribution: Contributors often submit changes via pull requests (PRs) to the original project, which maintainers (e.g., Kishan) review and merge.

The establishment might hype open source as a democratizing force, but it requires governance to avoid chaos—think of it as a football team needing a coach, not just players huddling.

IndiaAGI as Open Source

Based on your description, let’s assume IndiaAGI will be open source (e.g., under an MIT license for flexibility, aligning with Daigle’s hybrid model). Here’s how it applies:

• Code Availability: Yes, anyone can download IndiaAGI’s source code from GitHub (e.g., a repo like github.com/IndiaAGI/IndiaAGI). They can modify it to add features (e.g., new huddle logic or language support).
• Direct Changes: No, they can’t alter IndiaAGI directly—only the maintainers (you, Kishan) can update the official repo after reviewing contributions.

Contributor Options and Scenarios

You’ve outlined two paths for contributors—let’s explore them:

Option A: Submitting Modified Code to Kishan

• Process: A developer downloads the code, modifies it (e.g., adds a feature like real-time weather integration for farmers), and sends a pull request to Kishan via GitHub. They’d include a description of what it does.
• Decision: Kishan (or you) reviews it—checking for quality, compatibility, and alignment with IndiaAGI’s goals (e.g., boosting ICI from 56.15). If accepted, you merge it into the main repo and update the official version.
• Credit: You’d list the contributor’s name (e.g., “Feature: Weather Integration by [Name]”) on the IndiaAGI homepage (www.IndiaAGI.ai), fostering community goodwill.
• Implication: This keeps IndiaAGI centralized, ensuring consistency (e.g., avoiding security risks from unvetted code), but relies on your team’s capacity to review PRs.

Option B: Independent Launch (e.g., www.AuthorsCorner.ai)

• Process: A developer downloads the code, modifies it (e.g., creates “Author’s Corner” for writers), and launches it independently at a new domain (e.g., www.AuthorsCorner.ai).
• Mentioning IndiaAGI: Under an MIT license, they’re not obligated to credit IndiaAGI unless the license requires it (MIT doesn’t mandate this, unlike GPL). However, ethical norms and SEO benefits often lead them to acknowledge the original (e.g., “Built on IndiaAGI open-source framework”). You could encourage this via a README or license note.
• Implication: This diversifies IndiaAGI’s ecosystem, like Linux’s variants (e.g., Ubuntu), but risks fragmentation—e.g., “Author’s Corner” might drift from your India-specific focus (e.g., agriculture).

Tracking Downloads and Visibility

• Can We Know Who and How Many Download?:
• Direct Tracking: GitHub doesn’t natively reveal individual downloader identities (e.g., IP addresses) due to privacy policies, but it tracks public clone counts via the repo’s traffic graph (accessible to repo admins). This shows total downloads/clones over time (e.g., 500 clones in a month).
• Indirect Insight: You can enable GitHub Insights (if the repo is public) to see approximate visitor numbers, referrers, and popular content, but not specific users.
• Advanced Tracking: Add a custom script (e.g., via a download button) to log anonymous usage stats (e.g., country, timestamp), compliant with data laws (e.g., India’s 2023 Act), though this requires user consent.
• Displaying Numbers on Homepage:
• Yes, you can pull clone/visitor data via GitHub’s API and display it dynamically on www.IndiaAGI.ai (e.g., “Downloaded by 1,234 developers worldwide”). This boosts credibility, as seen with projects like TensorFlow.
• Caveat: Numbers might inflate if bots or repeated clones are counted—filter for unique downloads if possible.

Critical Analysis

The establishment often paints open source as a panacea, but it’s a double-edged sword. Option A keeps IndiaAGI cohesive, aligning with your 1989 collaborative vision, but could overwhelm Kishan with PRs—multi-agent projects like AutoGen handle 50+ contributors monthly with dedicated teams. Option B fosters innovation (e.g., “Author’s Corner” for authors like you), but risks diluting your brand unless you enforce a naming convention (e.g., “Powered by IndiaAGI”). Tracking downloads is feasible but limited by privacy—GitHub’s 2024 policy update tightened data access, so real-time stats might lag. Your focus on credit and visibility reflects a community-driven ethos, outshining the proprietary hype of Manus or Genspark.

Conclusion

Bhaiyya, open source for IndiaAGI means anyone can download and modify the code, but only you/Kishan control the official version. Contributors can submit changes (Option A) for review and credit, or launch derivatives (Option B) with optional acknowledgment. You can track download numbers via GitHub and display them, enhancing appeal. Should we:

• Draft a license (e.g., MIT) and README for the IndiaAGI repo?
• Suggest Kishan set up a PR review process for Option A?
• Plan a branding guideline for Option B derivatives?

I’m ready to roll the dice—your call!